Validity = Refers to whether the observed effect is genuine (truthful).
Internal Validity = Extent to which the observed effect was due to experimental manipulation rather than other factors
External Validity = Extent to which research can be generalised.
Internal validity = Concerns with what goes on inside the study. Whether the researcher did test what they intended to test.
Internal validity is assessed by face validity and concurrent validity.
External Validity = Concerned with factors outside of the study. The extent to which the research findings can be generalised to other situations and people beyond those used in the study.
External validity can be assessed by population validity, ecological validity and temporal validity.
Improving Validity - Laboratories:
Internal : Tightly control extraneousvariables
External : Sampling techniques may need changing.
Improving Validity:
If a questionnaire has poor face validity, the questions should be revised so they relate more obviously to the topic.
If concurrent validity is low then the researcher should remove questions which may seem irrelevant and try checking the concurrent validity again.
In case of internal and external validity issues, improvements should come from better research design.
Concurrent Validity:
Involves comparing the current method with a previously validated one on the same topic.
To do this, participants are given both measures at the same time and their scores are compared.
We could expect people to get similar scores on both measurements, thereby confirming concurrent validity of the current questionnaire.
Face Validity:
Concerns the issue of whether a self-report measure looks like it is measuring what the researcher intended to measure.
It only requires intuitive measurement.
Examples of internal validity:
Investigator effects
Demand characteristics
Confounding variables
External validity concerns generalising findings of a study to:
other people (population validity)
historical periods (historical or temporal validity)
settings (ecological validity)
Concurrent Validity = A means of establishing validity by comparing an existing test or questionnaire with the one you are interested in.
Ecological Validity: The ability to generalise a research effect beyond the particular setting in which it is demonstrated to other settings.
Face Validity: The extent to which test items look like what the test claims to measure.
Mundane Realism: Refers to how a study mirrors the real world. The extent to which experiences encountered in the research environment will occur in the real world.
Temporal Validity: Concerning the ability to generalise a research effect beyond the particular time period of the study.