Berieter & Engelmann: language spoken by black families is ungrammatical.
Concerns about EAL students falling behind are dismissed as Gilborn & Mirza (2000) say Indian pupils excel despite English being their second language
attitudes and values 

Black pupils socialised into a fatalistic live for today attitude that doesn’t value education instead of a mainstream culture of ambition, competitiveness, sacrificing for future goals
father, gangs and culture (Sewell 2009)
lack of tough firm, fair respectful discipline
fatherless black boys turn to street gangs that often promote anti school masculinity
academic black boys are labelled as sellouts and subject to peer pressure
dysfunctional family structures
Moynihan (1965): black lone mothers struggle with finances - children deprived of care and a male model. children fail in school and become inadequate parents themselves
new right sociologist Murray agrees
culture 

Scruton: low achievement in minorities because they fail to embrace british culture
Pryce (1979): experiencing colonial rule fostered a strong sense of cultural identity and self worth in Asians whereas black pupils haven’t
Asian families 

Sewell: indian & Chinese pupils benefit from supportive families that place high value on education (Asian work ethic)
Lupton(2004): adult authority in Asian families are alike to the ones in schools resulting in children respecting teachers. Asian parents more likely to support behaviour policies
white WC families
McCollon(2014): surveyed 16k pupils and found more ethnic minorities than white pupils aspire to go uni
lupton argues this is due to lack of parental support
Evans(2006): white wc street culture causes disruption in school.
criticisms
propose multicultural, antiracists education
Driver: lone parents give black girls strong, independent role models
Lawrence criticises Pryce: black pupils fail due to racism in the education system not weak culture/ low self esteem
Keddie: it is victim blaming - not culturally deprived but culturally different