A form of social influence where an individual complies with instructions or orders from an authority figure.
What was Milgram's sample and aim?
40 male volunteers who were randomly selected, believed the study was about memory
To observe whether people would obey a destructive authority figure when told to harm another person
What was Milgram's procedure?
Ppt. had the role of 'teacher' and confederate was the 'learner'
Teacher asked learner questions, if learner answered incorrectly or not at all they had to be given an electric shock ranging from 300-450 volts (which ppts. believed were real)
Experimenter (researcher) had to order the participant to administer the shock when they refused, increasing in terms of demandingness
What were Milgram's findings?
All 40participants went up to 300 volts, only 12.5% stopped here
65% went up to 450V
Shows that the vast majority of participants were prepared to administer lethal electric shocks
How does Milgram's study have high reliability?
Due to having a properly standardised procedure, the study has been replicated across the world where consistent results have been found
French documentary 'Le Jeu de la Mort' featured a game show where ppts. were paid to give fake electric shocks to actors and 80% delivered the maximum shock of 460V
Supports Milgram's original findings demonstrating that they were not just due to special circumstances
How does Milgram's study have high external validity?
Hofling et al covertly observed doctors and nurses in a natural experiment
Found 95% of nurses obeyed a confederate doctor over the phone to increase a patient's dosage of medicine to DOUBLE what the bottle advises
Shows 'everyday' individuals are still susceptible to obeying destructive authority figures
What are the ethical issues of Milgram's experiment?
Deception as participants were told the study was about memory - lack of fully informed consent
Participants showed signs of psychological and physiologicaldistress like trembling and sweating
These were also found in Jeu de la Mort study showing these results were due to faulty procedures
How does Milgram's experiment lack internal and ecological validity?
Prestigious Yale University setting may have led to participants trusting that nothing would happen to the confederate - when replicated in a run-down office obedience decreased to 47.5%. Study did not investigate its aims, could have been trust not obedience
Tasks given were not similar to real-life - areas of interest with this study like Nazi soldiers killing innocent Jews is nowhere near flicking a switch meaning the study lacks mundane realism
How did Milgram investigate proximity as a factor affecting obedience?
When teacher and learner were in the same room, obedience dropped from 62.5% to 40%
Shows that decreased proximity allows people to psychologically distance themselves from their actions and facing consequences
How did Milgram investigate location as a factor affecting obedience?
Obedience dropped to 47.5% when experiment was conducted in a run-down office block as opposed to the prestigious Yale University
Ppts. were more obedient in the prestigious setting because they perceived it as legitimate and authoritative
How did Milgram investigate uniform as a factor affecting obedience?
Obedience dropped to 20% when an experimenter wore everyday clothes rather than an experimenter who wore a lab coat as a symbol of authority
Uniforms are widely considered symbols of authority and so encourage obedience - makes us believe their authority is legitimate
What is the authoritarian personality as a dispositional explanation for obedience?
Adorno argued that these people show extreme respect and submissiveness to authority
Believe that society needs strong and powerful leaders to enforce traditional values
Show contempt for those with inferior social statuses
Have an absolutist'fixed' cognitive style of thinking
People with this trait are more likely to obey
Can be measured using the F-scale rating agreement with certain statements
What are the origins of the authoritarian personality?
Forms in childhood (psychodynamic theory) as a result of harsh parenting styles featuring strict discipline, impossibly high standards and severe over-criticism - parents give conditional love based on child's behaviour
Leads to resentment and hostility in a child who displaces this anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others who they think are weaker (scapegoating)
What was Adorno et al.'s research?
Used the F-scale to study white Americans unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups
Found that people with authoritarian leanings and scored high on the F-scale were very status-conscious and showed extreme respect to those of higher status
These people had very 'black and white' thinking, with fixed and distinctive stereotypes about other groups
What is the agentic state as an explanation for obedience?
Belief that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Agentic shift: when someone in an autonomous state (holding accountability for their own actions) shifts to an agentic state
People more likely to obey in this state as they believe they are acting on behalf of an agent and won't suffer the consequences
What is legitimacy of authority as an explanation for obedience?
People are more likely to obey authority figures who are seen as credible in terms of morals
Explains why students are more likely to listen to parents/teachers over strangers
Milgram's participants saw him as a knowledgeable and responsible scientist which is perhaps why obedience was high
What is a strength of the agentic state and legitimacy of authority explanations?
Can successfully explain real-life examples of obedience to destructive authority figures
My Lai massacres - American soliders murdered civilians when invading Vietnamese villages
Soldiers were simply obeying orders from their Generals and shifted responsibility for their actions onto them (agentic state)
Authority was legitimate due to generals having high positions within the ranks - shows explanations are valid
How is political bias a weakness of the authoritarian personality explanation?
F-scale measures the likeness between an individual to far-right wing fascism and ignores far left-wing authoritarianism which has much similarities like complete obedience to authority
Suggests Adorno's theory is not a comprehensive explanation as it doesn't account for obedience across the whole political spectrum
How do methodological issues weaken the authoritarian personality explanation?
F-scale is susceptible to acquiscence bias - where respondents can receive a high score by always responding in the same way like selecting 'Agree' (Greenstein)
Means anyone with a response bias can be classed as having an AP which means findings lack validity