The fact that someone else is not following the majority is social support
Dissenting confederate enables naive participants to be free and follow their own conscience, acting as a 'model' of independent behaviour
Confederates dissent gives rise to more dissent as the majority is no longer unanimous and pressure to conform can be resisted
How can social support help resist obedience?
Milgram - rate of obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when joined by a dissenting confederate
Other person's disobedience acts as a model of dissent for participant to be free to act from their own conscience
Dissenter challenges legitimacy of the authority figure, making it easier to disobey
What are Rotter's locusts of control?
Internal LOC: things that happen are largely controlled by themselves
External LOC: things that happen are outside their control
LOC is a scale and individuals vary in their positions on it
How do locusts of control affect resistance to social influence?
High internal LOCS can resist pressures to conform or obey easily because they base their decisions on their own beliefs and don't depend on others' opinions
High external LOCs are particularly susceptible to obedience
What research support is there to strengthen the positive effects of social support?
Albrecht et al. - programme called Teen Fresh Start USA tried to help pregnant adolescents resist peer pressure to smoke by giving them an older mentor
Those with a mentor were less likely to smoke than a control group without one
Shows social support can help young people resist social influence in the real-world
What research support is there to strengthen the role of dissenting peers in resisting obedience?
Gamson et al. - told participants to produce evidence that would help an oil company run a smear campaign
88% of participants rebelled against these orders after discussing in groups what they were told to do - showing peer support can lead to disobedience as it undermines the legitimacy of an authority figure
What research supports the link between locusts of control and social responsibility?
Oliner and Oliner (1988) interviewed 406 people who protected and rescuedJews from Nazis during the holocaust and 126 people who did not
Rescuers found to have an internal LOC and scored high on measures of social responsibility
How does contradictory research weaken the link between locusts of control and resistance?
Twenge et al. conducted a meta-analysis of LOC studies conducted over a 40 year period from 1960 to 2002
Found that people became more resistant to obedience but also more external, going against expectations that resistance is linked to an internal LOC
Shows LOC is not a valid explanation of how people realistically resist social influence