A01

Cards (8)

  • What is retrieval failure?
    Forgetting information due to the absence of cues; the information is available but not accessible.
  • Define the encoding specificity principle
    Cues at learning must be present at retrieval to aid memory
  • Name the two types of retrieval failure
    1. State-dependent forgetting
    2. Context-dependent forgetting
  • What is context-dependent forgetting?
    Memory is more effective if the external environment is the same at learning and recall.
  • What is state-dependent forgetting?
    Memory is more effective if your internal state is the same at learning and recall
  • Outline the research support for context-dependent forgetting - include the researchers, procedures and findings
    Godden and Baddeley (1975) - deep sea divers:
    - deep sea divers learned a list of words either underwater or on land and then asked to recall the words either underwater or on land creating 4 conditions:
    1. learn on land -> recall on land
    2. learn on land -> recall underwater
    3. learn underwater -> recall underwater
    4. learn underwater -> recall on land
    - recall was 40% lower in non-matching conditions as the external cues available at learning were different from the ones at recall = retrieval failure
  • Outline the research support for state-dependent forgetting - include the researchers, procedures and findings
    Carter and Cassaday (1998) - anti-histamines:
    - participants were given anti-histamine drugs making them drowsy
    - participants had to learn lists of words and passages of prose and then recall info, creating 4 conditions:
    1. learn on drug -> recall on drug
    2. learn on drug -> recall off drug
    3. learn off drug -> recall off drug
    4. learn off drug -> recall on drug
    - recall was significantly worse in conditions where there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall
  • Outline the research support for the encoding specificity principle - include the researchers, procedure and findings
    Tulving and Pearlstone (1966):
    - participants had to learn a list of 48 words belonging to categories
    - asked to recall the words in one of 2 conditions:
    1. free recall - not given categories
    2. cued recall - given categories
    - participants in free recall condition recalled 40% of words, whereas participants in cued recall recalled 60% of words