participant must know what they are consenting to in order to decide whether they want to participate
What is meant by deception?
misleading/lying or withholding information
What is meant by right to withdraw?
participant must know that they have the right to withdraw from the study during or after
What is meant by protection from psychological harm?
participant must be no more at risk than everyday life
What is meant by privacy and confidentiality?
keeping personal details hidden
Why is informed consent an issue?
revealing true aim may lead to demand characteristics
Why is deception an issue?
you cannot give informed consent if you have information withheld from you
Why is the right to withdraw an issue?
participant may feel they shouldn't as they'll spoil study -> skew findings
Why is protection from psychological harm an issue?
might not be able to predict the harm the participants will experience (e.g. Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Experiment)
Why is privacy and confidentiality an issue?
->may be able to work out identity from other info
->or if the experiment takes place in a public area then informed consent isn't needed -> what constitutes as a public area?
What is meant by presumptive consent?
get people of similar characteristics to real participant and ask them to decide whether they would consent or not, if they would consent then assume real participant would
What is meant by prior general consent?
give real participant a list of experiments to consent to, with real experiment disguised within it, if participant agrees to all then they consent to real experiment without knowing which one is happening
What is meant by retrospective consent?
Consent gained after the experiment has already taken place
What are the types of alternative consent which can be gained?
presumptive consent
prior general consent
retrospective consent
What should a debriefing include?
true aim
any details not previously given
right to withdraw data
how data will be used
How can psychologists deal with informed consent?
->Alternatives:
presumptive consent
prior general consent
retrospective consent
-> debriefing
How can psychologists deal with deception?
-> debriefing
-> cost benefit analysis
What is meant by a cost benefit analysis?
Evaluation of the potential benefits of a decision compared to the costs involved
How can psychologists deal with the right to withdraw?
ensure participants know they have the right to withdraw all throughout study
How can psychologists deal with protection from psychological harm?
-> right to withdraw
-> debriefing including reassurance their behaviour was normal
-> offer counselling if harm is done
How can psychologists deal with privacy and confidentiality?
-> should not record names -> refer by number or initials (e.g. HM)