theories of romantic relationships: investment model

    Cards (7)

    • rusbults investment model:
      • satisfaction level, comparison with alternatives, investment size
      • commitment level
      • relationship maintenance
    • satisfaction + comparison with alternatives:
      • satisfaction based on rewards/costs + getting more from relationship than they expected based on past experiences
      • satisfaction based on CL + comparison with alternatives - identify whether needs are met outside relationship
    • investment size:
      • extent + importance of resources associated with relationship
      • intrinsic investments = any resources put in relationship e,g money, energy
      • extrinsic investments = resources acquired since relationship started e.g car, shared memories
      • satisfaction high, alternatives less attractive, investment size large, predict partners will be committed
    • relationship maintenance mechanisms:
      • accommodation - act to promote relationship, no retaliation
      • willingness to sacrifice
      • forgiveness
      • positive illusions - unrealistically positive about partner
      • ridiculing alternatives - negative about tempting alternatives
    • EVALUATION: research support
      • le + agnew - metanalysis 11000 5 countries - predicted commitment, more commitment, more stable
      • outcomes true for men, women, hetero, gay couples from all cultures
      • some validity to model, factors are important features universally
    • EVALUATION: explains abusive relationships
      • surprising that people subjected to violence continue commitment
      • rusbult + mars - battered women in shelter, mostly likely to return to partner reported greatest investment + no alternatives
      • victims dont have to be satisfied to stay
    • EVALUATION: oversimplifies investment
      • goodfriend + agnew - more to investments than resources put in, early stages = few investments
      • extended model - includes investment partner makes in future, motivated to stay together to see plans work out
      • limited explanation, fails to understand complexity of investments