reliability + validity

Cards (9)

  • reliability:
    • how consistent the findings from the investigation/ measuring device are
    • measuring device - reliable if produces consistent results everytime its used
  • reliability of observational techniques:
    • assessing - repeat observation e.g rewatching + inter rate reliability - comparing with observer
    • improving - behavioural categories have to be operationalised, observers need to be equally experienced
    • graph - observer a on x axis, b on y (scattergram = +0.8 good reliability)
  • self report techniques:
    • assessing - test/retest reliability e.g give test again, inter-interviewer reliability e.g extent to which interviewers agree
    • improving - reduce ambiguity e.g rewrite questions, use same interviewer each time + good training to reduce leading questions
  • experiments:
    • DV often measured using rating scale/ behavioural categories - method used to measure should be consistent
    • improving - standardisation, instructions, procedures same each time, experiment is repeated then compared
  • validity:
    • producing a result that is legitimate
    • internal - study measures what its meant to measure
    • external - findings can be generalised beyond research setting
  • factors that affect internal validity:
    • investigator effects
    • not operationalised
    • cofounding variables
    • social desirability bias
    • demand characteristics
  • ecological validity:
    • to do with how DV is measured
    • example: field experiment godden + baddeley learning word lists - low mundane realism + aware theyre being assessed low ecological validity
  • assessing validity:
    • face validity - extent to which test items look like what the test is meant to measure
    • concurrent validity - comparing existing method/test with the one you want to use e.g existing questionnaire, one you want to use
  • improving validity:
    • poor face validity - rewrite questions, poor concurrent - remove irrelevant questions
    • demand characteristics + investigator effects - double blind
    • experiment - control group + standardisation
    • questionnaires - anonymity, no social desirability bias
    • observations - covert + behavioural categories operationalised
    • triangulation - number of different sources used as evidence