Milgram

Cards (23)

  • What was the main finding of Milgram's obedience experiment?
    Ordinary people obey authority figures
  • What did participants do in Milgram's experiment?
    Administer electric shocks to a learner
  • What ethical concerns were raised about Milgram's study?
    Participants experienced significant distress
  • What is meant by "lack of ecological validity" in Milgram's study?

    The artificial setting does not reflect real life
  • What was a limitation of Milgram's sample?
    It consisted only of white, Western males
  • How did Sheridan and King's study differ from Milgram's?
    They used a live puppy instead of a human learner
  • What were the results of Sheridan and King's study?
    20 out of 26 participants obeyed commands
  • What do Sheridan and King's findings suggest about Milgram's conclusions?
    People obey authority even when causing harm
  • What gender differences were observed in Sheridan and King's study?
    All female participants obeyed, some males did not
  • How does Milgram's study contribute to our understanding of obedience?
    It shows situational factors influence behavior
  • What real-world implications arise from Milgram's findings?
    Ordinary people can commit acts of cruelty
  • Why is Milgram's study considered ethnocentric?
    It only included white Western males
  • What does "lack of ecological validity" mean in Milgram's context?
    Artificial setting may not reflect real behavior
  • What critique did Orne and Holland raise about Milgram's design?
    Participants may have guessed the study's nature
  • What is the key difference in the victim between Milgram's and Sheridan and King's studies?
    Milgram used an actor, Sheridan and King used a puppy
  • What was the main finding regarding obedience levels in Sheridan and King's study?
    Majority continued to administer shocks despite distress
  • What does the finding about male participants in Sheridan and King's study suggest?
    Gender dynamics influence obedience levels
  • How might "volunteer personality" affect obedience studies?
    Volunteers may act differently than the general population
  • How does Milgram's study address the factor of replicability?
    It has been replicated with consistent results
  • What are two potential essay questions based on the material?
    Discuss authoritarian personality and alternative explanations
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of Milgram's obedience study?
    Strengths:
    • High reliability and internal validity
    • Replicated multiple times with consistent results

    Weaknesses:
    • Ethnocentric and androcentric sample
    • Lacks ecological validity
    • Potential volunteer bias
  • What are the implications of Milgram's study for real-world situations?
    • Understanding mass violence and cruelty
    • Ordinary people can commit harmful acts
    • Influence of authority on behavior
  • What are the key differences between Milgram's study and Sheridan and King's study?
    • Milgram used an actor; Sheridan and King used a puppy
    • Sheridan and King aimed to address demand characteristics
    • Different findings regarding gender and obedience