Save
...
Attachment
Cultural Variations In Attachment
AO1
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Millie O’Driscoll
Visit profile
Cards (6)
What is the van IJzendoorn study on cultural variations in attachment?
Looked at
proportion
of
attachment
types
across
countries
and
differences
within
countries
(idea of variations within culture)
What was the procedure for the van IJzendoorn study on cultural variations in attachment?
Researchers located
32
studies of attachment using
Strange
Situation
in
8
countries
(
15
in US)
Results for
1990
children =
meta-analysis
What were the findings for the van IJzendoorn study on cultural variations in attachment?
Secure
attachment
most
common
in
all
countries
(
75%
Britain
/
50%
China
)
Insecure-resistant
least
common
(
3%
Britain
/
30%
Israel
)
Insecure-avoidant
common
in
Germany
/
least
common
in
Japan
Individualist cultures =
insecure-resistant
similar
to
Ainsworth
og sample (under
14%
)
Collectivist cultures =
insecure-resistant
above
25%
&
insecure-avoidant
attachment
less
than
Ainsworth
og sample
Variations
within
countries
150%
greater
than
between
countries
What is the Italian study of cultural variations in attachment (Simonelli)?
Experiment to see if
proportions
of babies of different attachment types
still
matches
those found in previous studies
Assessed
76
babies
(
12
months
old) using
SS
50%
were
secure
&
36%
insecure-avoidant
=
lower
rate
of
secure
studies
&
higher
rate
of
insecure-avoidant
attachment
Due to
increasing
numbers
of
mothers
of young children
work
long
hours
and
use
professional
childcare
Suggest that
patterns
of
attachment
are
affected
by
cultural
change.
What is the Korean study of cultural variations in attachment (Kyoung Jin)?
Experiment to see if
proportions
of babies of different attachment types
still
matches
those found in previous studies
Assessed
87
babies using
SS
Similar
results
of
secure
and
insecure
babies
compared
to original
SS
More
of those
classified
as
insecure
were
insecure-resistant
Only
1
baby
was
insecure-avoidant
Similar
to the
distribution
of
attachment
types
found in
japan
=
Japan
&
Korea
have
similar
child
rearing
styles
What are the conclusions from the various cultural variations in attachment studies?
Secure
attachment
norm
in
wide
range
of
cultures
(
support
Bowlby's
idea
= attachment in
innate
/
universal
)
Culture
influences
attachment