Vicarious Liability

Cards (6)

  • What is vicarious liability and who's involved?
    Employers held responsible for actions of employees
    • Tortfeasor (TF)- committed the tort
    • Claimant
    • Defendant
  • What did Trustees of Barry do:

    Give out overall test
    1. Relationship between D and TF that makes it proper for D to pay
    2. Connection between relationship and tort
    Can be:
    • Unintentional tort e.g. negligence
    • Intentional tort - e.g. battery
  • Relationship between D and TF that makes it proper for D to pay
    (split in two parts - Part 1)
    TF is an employee
    1. Control test - who has right to control actions of TF - Yewen v Noakes
    2. Integration test - difference between contract of service (employee = liable) and contract for services (independent contractor = not liable) - S,J,H v M,E
    3. Economic test - looks at money - Ready Mixed Concrete
    Two employees could share responsibility - Viasystems
    No liability for independent contractors - Barclays
  • Relationship between D and TF that makes it proper for D to pay
    Part 2
    Or TF is akin to employment
    Liability is outside of traditional employment - Cox v Ministry of Justice
    Christian Brothers:
    1. TF doing activity on behalf of D
    2. Activity is likely to be part of D's business
    3. D created risk of tort by asking T to do it
    Prisoners in kitchens - Cox
    Foster parents - Armes
    Elders in church - Barry
  • A connection between relationship and tort
    Unintentional torts - Were TF's actions in course of employment?
    Are:
    • Authorised acts - Poland v Parr
    • Acts close to job description - London v Cattermoles
    • Doing what employed to do in unauthorised way - Limpus
    • Doing what employed to do in careless way - Century Insurance
    • Employer benefits from tort - Rose v Plenty
    Are not:
    • Activities not in scope of employment - Beard
    • Employee is on frolic of his own - Hilton v Thomas
    • Unauthorised acts with no benefit to employer - Twine v Beans
  • A connection between relationship and tort
    Intentional torts - Close connections test
    Lister v Hesley Hall created test
    1. What field of activities has been entrusted to TF
    2. Is there a close connection between field of activities and tort
    If yes = D is liable
    Examples-
    • Armes
    • Barry
    • Mattis