Asch found that people were more likely to conform when there was unanimous agreement among confederates.
Asch had 18 trials and got confederates to give the wrong answer on 12 of the 18 trials
he wanted to see if the participant would go along with the majority on those trials
to make sure this was happening, he also had a control group that tested individually - 0.04% error rate, so he could conclude that the experiment had low task difficulty
the behaviour of asch's experiments is best explained by normative social influence
since task difficulty was low and social pressure was high
participants were most likely displaying compliance
75% of participants in the test group conformed at least once
and participants conformed 36.8% of the time
25% of participants never conformed
Asch's sample was all american male undergraduates
Androcentricbeta bias
size of majority
two confederates = participants only conformed on 14% of critical trials
three confederates = participants conformed on 32% of critical trials
there is little change to conformity when you increase the amount of confederates from three
unanimity of majority
participants were joined by another participant or a correct confederate
conformity decreased to 5.5%
more unanimity = more confidence in answer
easier to resist the pressure to conform
task difficulty
made the lines more similar
increases informational social influence
more likely to conform when people are less confident