Bem’s numerical approach is useful for research purposes when it is necessary
However, Spence (1984) argued that there is more to gender than typicalbehaviours of one gender, so qualitative methods offer a better way of analysing gender; a compromise being to combinedifferentscales
This suggests that both quantitative together with qualitative approaches may be useful for studying different aspects of androgyny
What is a strength for the BSRI?
Valid & Reliable
The scale was developed by asking 50male and 50female judges to rate 200 traits in terms of how much the traits represented masculinity and femininity and each that scored highest became the 20 traits used on the scale
The BSRI was then piloted with over 1000 students and the results corresponded with the participants’ own description of their gender identity, as well as a follow-up study produced similar scores
This gives us reason to believe the test was both valid and reliable
What is a limitation for the BSRI?
Temporal Validity
The BSRI was developed over 40 years ago and behaviours that are regarded as typical in relation to gender have changed significantly since then
The BSRI is made up of stereotypical ideas of masculinity and femininity that may be outdated
This suggests the BSRI may lack temporal validity and generalisability, and may not be a suitable measure of gender identity
What is a limitation for the BSRI?
Self-Awareness
Asking people to rate themselves on a questionnaire relies on people having an understanding on their personality and behaviour that they may not necessarily have
The questionnaire’s scoring system is subjective and people’s application of the 7-point system may differ
This suggests that the BSRI may not be an objective, scientific way of assessing masculinity, femininity or androgyny