Martin & Halverson’s (1983) study found that children under6 were more likely to remember photographs of stereotypically genderappropriate behaviour when tested a week later
Children tended to change the gender of the person carrying out the gender-inappropriate activity in the photographs when asked to recall them
This supports the gender schema theory which predicts children under 6 would do this, in contrast to Kohlberg’s theory
What is a strength for Gender Schema Theory?
Cultural Differences
Cherry (2019) argues that gender schema not only influence how people process information, but also what counts as culturally-appropriate gender behaviour
In societies where perceptions of gender have less rigid boundaries, children are more likely to acquire more fluid gender schema, showing that gender schema theory can explain how gender schema are shared between members of a society
This contrasts with some other explanations of gender development, such as psychodynamic theory, which suggests gender identity is more driven by unconscious biological urges
What is a strength for Gender Schema Theory?
Specific Ages
It may not be appropriate to argue about specific ages for genderschema theory, as it suggests that the key point is the shifts in a child’s thinking and the ages are averages rather than absolute
It is possible that many children may move through stages quicker or slower than others, and it is the sequence of development that is more important
This suggests that Zosuls et al’s finding is not a fundamental criticism of the theory
What is a limitation for Gender Schema Theory?
Earlier Gender Identity
Zosuls et al (2009) collected data that was obtained from twice-weekly reports from mothers on their children’s language from 9 - 21 months, alongside videotaped analysis of the children at play
They key measure of gender identity was taken to be how and when children labelled themselves as a ‘boy’ or a ‘girl’, which occurred on average at 19 months, which suggests that children have a genderidentity but just do not communicate it
This suggests that Martin & Halverson may have underestimated children’s ability to use gender labels about themselves