What is a strength for the SLT Explanation for Gender?
Cultural Changes
There are less of a clear-cut distinction between what people regard as stereotypically masculine and feminine behaviour in many societies today than throughout history
As there has been no corresponding change in people’s basic biology, such a shift is better explained by social learning theory than the biological approach
This shows that social learning is one approach that can explain cultural changes in gender behaviour
What is a strength for the SLT Explanation for Gender?
Research Support
Smith & Lloyd (1978) involved babies aged 4 - 6 months old were dressed half the time in boys‘ clothes and half the time in girls’ clothes
When observed interacting with adults, babies who were assumed to be a boy were encouraged to be adventurous and active, whereas presumed girls were told they were pretty and were reinforced for being passive
This suggests that gender appropriate behaviour is stamped in at an early age through differential reinforcement, supporting social learning theory
What is a limitation for the SLT Explanation of Gender?
Hormonal Differences
Differential reinforcement may not be the cause of gender differences in behaviour
Adults, during interactions with their own children, may be responding to innate genderdifferences that are already there, such as boys being encouraged to be more active may be due to hormonal differences, making them more active anyways
This suggests that it is likely that sociallearning is only part of the explanation of how children acquire gender-related behaviours
What is a limitation for the SLT Explanation of Gender?
No Developmental Sequence
The general implication of the social learning approach is that modelling of gender-appropriate behaviour can occur at any age
However, it is illogical that children who are young would view the world the same way as a child who is older, also conflicting with Kohlberg’s theory
This suggests that influence of age and maturation on learning gender concepts is not a factor considered by social learning theory