Contemporary study Crim

Cards (19)

  • What is the aim of Howells et al. (2005) study?
    To see if offender characteristics predict improvement
  • What does the study compare regarding anger management?
    Effectiveness of AMP versus treatment
  • How many male offenders participated in the study?
    418 male offenders
  • What was the mean age of the offenders in the study?
    28.8 years
  • What percentage of offenders came from prison-based AMP?
    86%
  • What was the follow-up duration for the assessments?
    Two and six months
  • What was the attrition rate at the follow-up sessions?
    Not a large attrition rate
  • How many sessions did offenders attend in the AMP?
    10 sessions
  • How long did each session last?
    2 hours
  • What skills did offenders identify during the sessions?
    Provocations, relaxation, cognitive restructuring
  • What type of measures did offenders complete?
    International self-report measures
  • How were questionnaires administered for those with literacy issues?
    Verbally administered
  • What did staff complete for each offender?
    Observational staff rating scale
  • What was the result of the AMP on anger knowledge at the two-month follow-up?
    Greater improvement than the control group
  • What was the significant finding regarding offenders' ability to manage anger?
    Not significantly different from the control group
  • What factor predicted improvement in offenders?
    Higher readiness for treatment
  • What was the conclusion regarding predictions about offenders benefiting from AMP?
    Motivated offenders had the biggest positive change
  • What was noted about the overall impact of AMP?
    Limited impact and benefits not always sustained
  • Describe Howells et al sample and procedure
    • 418 male offenders mostly violent from different ethnic backgrounds in Australia that had been referred to AMP
    • 86% from prison based AMP while rest from community programmes
    • Offenders attended 10 sessions lasting 2 hours each
    • They had to identify provocations, relaxation, cognitive restricting and relapse prevention via skills activities
    • They also completed 2 international self report measures about experiences of anger and triggers before and after attending the programme