peer review is the practice of using independent experts to assess quality and validity of scientific research and academic reports
main aims of peer review include
allocation of research funding - decide whether or not to award funding for proposed research projects
validate and relevance of research - all elements of research are assessed for quality and accuracy - formulation of hypothesis, methodology chosen and conclusions drawn
suggest amendments or improvements - may suggest minor revisions of work or may conclude work is inappropriate for publication and so should be withdrawn
strengths of peer review
anonymity is there to protect the researcher and those who are reviewing - allows to establish data is valid and reliable and which is not trusted
can be unbiased due to those reviewing not knowing researcher
limitations of peer review
you cannot always find suitable expert
anonymity is not perfect - reviewers may use their anonymity against authors they are reviewing
publication bias - usually wanting positive results suggesting not all research is published
cannot be applied to all research already published - people can be exposed to data that is not valid