Use of a probability level- e.g. (0.05- less than 5% chance that results are due to chance, result is likely to be due to the IV so statisticallysignificant)
Drug trials -> stricter probability level -> 1% /0.01
Statistical test calculation done- (calculated / observed value) this is compared with a table of critical values (must be greater than / lower than critical value- significant result)
KEY POINT:
”R” in name
CALCULATED value must be GREATER THAN / EQUAL TO the CRITICAL value to be SIGNIFICANT
No “R” - CALCULATED value must be EQUAL TO / LESS THAN the CRITICAL value for SIGNIFICANCE
HOW TO WORK OUT CRITICAL VALUES:
Is the hypothesis directional, non-directional?
Number of ppts in the study (N) / degrees of freedom (df)
Level of significance (normally 0.05 unless stated otherwise)
PROBABILITY / SIGNIFICANCE:
Stats tests can be used to accept the experimental OR null hypothesis
0.05 / 5%significance level used in psychology (95% chance of significance- acceptable level)
TYPE 1 ERROR:
Mistakenly reject null & accept alternative hypothesis
Significance levels too lenient (too high- e.g 10% rather than 5%)
”False hope”- think there is significant difference / correlation, but there isn’t one
TYPE 2 ERROR:
Null hypothesis accepted, alternative rejected
Significance level too strict e.g. 0.01 instead of 0.05