Save
1st - sem 1
Labs Semester 1:
BM Ch11
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Natasha Hess
Visit profile
Cards (49)
one-group
,
pretest-posttest design
one group, measure before and after exposure to
IV
, no comparison group
View source
threats to validity in one-group pretest/posttests
maturation
, history,
regression
,
attrition
,
testing
, instrumentation, combined
View source
maturation threats
getting used to the conditions, a change in behaviour that emerges almost
spontaneously
over time
View source
example of maturation threats
spontaneous remission
View source
including a comparison group can prevent...
maturation
,
history
,
regression
, testing threats
View source
history
threats
something else has happened between the two tests
View source
regression threats
regressing
to the
mean
- when a score is particularly high/low, the next score is likely to be closer to the mean, becomes a threat if a group is chosen due to particularly high/low
prestest
View source
attrition
(/
mortality
) threats
a reduction in
participants
when they drop out of the study
View source
attrition is a threat when...
the loss is
systematic
(one type of participant)
View source
preventing
attrition threats
remove their
pretest score
, or check it to identify if it is particularly high or low
View source
testing threats
specific type of
order effect
, a change in the
participant
due to taking the test
multiple
times
View source
testing threats specific examples
practice
/
fatigue
effects
View source
preventing testing threats
switch to
posttest-only
, use
alternative tests
for each
View source
instrumentation threats
when a measuring instrument changes over time, or the tests for
before
and
after
are different but not sufficiently equivalent
View source
preventing
instrumentation threats
switch to
posttest-only
, ensure tests are
equivalent
,
counterbalance
test types
View source
combined threats: selection-history threat
outside factor affects those at one level of the
IV
View source
combined threats: selection-attrition threat
one
experimental group
experiences attrition
View source
threats to internal validity (all studies)
observer bias
, demand characteristics,
placebo effect
View source
observer bias
when
researchers'
expectations influence their interpretation of the results
View source
observer bias
threatens...
internal
and
construct validity
View source
demand characteristics
cues in an experiment that tell the
participant
what behaviour is
expected
, therefore changing their behaviour
View source
double-blind studies
neither
participant
nor
researcher
knows which group a participant is in
View source
masked design (blind design)
participant
knows what group they are in, the observer does not
View source
placebo effect
when the
participant
receives a treatment and does improve, but only because they believe their treatment is
valid
View source
placebo effect may include...
placebo side effects
View source
double-blind placebo control study
a study that uses a
treatment group
and a
placebo group
and in which neither the
research staff
nor the
participants
know who is in which group
View source
double-blind placebo control studies may also include...
no treatment groups
View source
null effects/results
no
significant
covariance in
IV
and
DV
(very common)
View source
cause of null effects
incorrect theory (
IV
does not affect
DV
), study poorly designed
View source
not enough between-groups difference
weak
manipulations
, insensitive measures,
ceiling and floor effects
View source
weak
manipulations
small, negligible differences between the levels of the
IV
View source
insensitive measures
operationalisation
not sensitive enough
View source
ceiling effects
all scores squeezed together at
high end
View source
floor effects
all scores squeezed together at the
low end
View source
ceiling and floor effects are special cases of...
weak manipulations
and
insensitive measures
View source
manipulation checks used to detect...
weak manipulations
,
ceilings
and
floors
View source
design confounds
in
reverse
reverse or counteract the true result
View source
too much within-groups variability
measurement error
, individual differences, situation noise, problem with
statistical validity
- disrupts detection of a true difference
View source
problem with statistical validity
greater overlap = smaller
effect size
= less likely to be
significant
View source
measurement error (human or instrument)
lots of measurement error = greater
spread
View source
See all 49 cards