given the right circumstances, just about anyone will do just about anything they are told to, providing they believe the person is under legitimate authority
what was the evolutionary and societal function of obedience?
it naturally organises itself into different hierarchy and expect people under us to follow us and we follow ones above us
what happened to societal groups when hierarchy evolved?
social leaders were more successful and groups survived
what would happen if there was no obedience in a group?
changes to the social order would result in societal breakdown
how do people know how to be obedient?
nature and nurture
what part of nature allows us to know obedience?
innate preparedness - we are born with the capacity for language and similarly we are prepared for obedience passed on genetically
how does nurture allow us to know obedience?
socialisation - our upbringing and exposure to authority like family figures and teachers in education
what were Milgram's two different states that humans exist in?
in autonomous state and agentic state
what does being in a autonomous state mean?
as humans we act accordingly to our own free will and direct our own behaviour
what is an example of being in autonomous state in Milgram's study?
when the participant refused to continue delivering shocks to learner
what does being in the agentic state mean?
an individual places their responsibility and actions onto the authority figure - seeing themselves as an agent for authority figure making them not responsible in their eyes
what is an example of being in agentic state in Milgram's study?
continuing when they were told that they wouldn't be responsible as a participant for learner's health
what is moral strain?
psychological discomfort that happens when someone is torn between obeying authority figure or their own conscience
what physical symptoms can moral strain cause?
stress related responses like stuttering and anxeity
what are the 2 ways you can stop moral strain?
shift into an agentic state - pass responsibility for actions onto authority figure
adopt into a autonomous state - take responsibility and disobey the authority figure
what was the evidence for Agency theory? (pos)
Milgram's participants became distressed - suggesting they endured moral strain
many said that they obeyed as experimenter said that he takes responsibility for what happenes
what was the downside to the evidence for Agency theory? (neg)
research lacks mundane realism as its not like a real life scenario
criticism as lacks internal validity because participants didn't believe that they weren't delivering real shocks
what was the conclusion for the evidence?
validity has been questioned in real life settings because of Sheridan and King experiment in real settings
where can this theory be applied to?
explaining the atrocities of obedience in second WW
educating people about blind obedience to malevolent authority and wanted o reduce likelihood
used to understand how to increase obedience - displacement of responsibility to authority figure
what is a strength about this theory?
the theory is interactionist because it takes into account nature and nurture - less reductionist than other obedience theories
takes into account individual differences as different upbringing - education, culture, economical status
what is a shortcoming of the theory?
it is descriptive rather than being explanative as it doesn't explain why some people go further - e.g mutilation of bodies at My Lai massacre
what is the conclusion for strength and shortcoming?
the theory explains some aspects of obedience, it doesn't take in to account the motivation behind someone's behaviour
what are the alternative theories for agency theory?
not all instructions ask someone to do something immoral
some cases agency theory better than social impact theory explaining obedience