Change in a person's behaviour or opinions as a result of real/imagined pressure from a person/group of people.
What are the 3 types of conformity?
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
What does compliance mean?
Going along with the demand even if you don’t agree with it in order to achieve awards or avoid punishment
Public behaviour changes but private doesn’t
What does identification mean?
Acting the same way as the group because they value it and want to be a part of it in order to be accepted
Public behaviour changes but private behaviour only changes when they value something about the group
What does internalisation mean?
Genuinely accepting the group’s norms and think that they are right in order to be right
Public and private behaviour changes
What are the 2 reasons why people conform?
Informational social influence (ISI)
Normative social influence (NSI)
What is a strength of explanations of conformity?
Research support for NSI
Asch found that many participants conformed rather than giving the correct answer because they were afraid of disapproval – when participants wrote down answers instead of calling them out, conformity fell to 12.5% = conformity is due to a desire not to be rejected by a group for disagreeing with them
What is the counter argument for 'research support for NSI' of explanations of conformity?
He only tested on American male students, suggesting that this research support may only apply to a specific group of people, rather than the overall explanation
What is a strength of explanations of conformity?
Research support for ISI
Lucas et al found participants conformed more to incorrect answers when maths problems were difficult – for harder problems, the situation was ambiguous, so they relied on the answer they were given (they wanted to be right)
What is a limitation of explanations of conformity?
Individual differences in NSI
Some people are more concerned about being liked by others – nAffiliators have a strong need for affiliation (need to relate to other people). McGhee and Teevan found students who were nAffiliators were more likely to conform = explanation lacks generalisability