libertarianism rejects universal causation + claims we have causally undetermined choices
they accept that:
our bodies are subject to casual laws
nature + nurture may exert strong influence on our moral decisions, but these are not necessarily determinant
human beings do have moral responsibility because they have some degree of free will
evaluating libertarianism:
assumptions of this theory are no more provable than hard determinism
argument against Skinner: those who insist we are determined are merely making a determined statement, so why should we listen?
positive approach to moral decision making: libertarians believe they are deliberately + rationally achieving moral goals, as opposed to following a predetermined path
libertarians often distinguish between someone's formed character/personality and their moral self
personality is governed by causal laws, which are capable of scientific explanation + prediction
personality is formed by hereditary + environment, limiting the choices one has
argument of experience:
we have direct + certain experience of being self-determining e.g. choosing to drink tea or coffee
this is a common experience to everyone
we have the immediate experience of making choice
argument from the act of decision making:
we all do this, demonstrating we possess free will
we can only make decisions about what to do if we do not already know what we are going to do
since we all make decisions we must believe that we can make choices + that we are free
free will cannot be proven, but it is accepted as a contingent truth
but it is difficult to know exactly how the brain is able to act freely + what part of it is involved