cues are stored, if not available at time of recall - retrieval failure
accessibility not availability problem
encoding specificity principle (Tulving):
cue has to be present at both encoding + retrieval - if cues are different forgetting will occur
context dependent forgetting = external
state dependent forgetting = internal
context dependent (Godden + Baddeley):
deep sea divers divided in 4 groups
learn words on land, recall on land + vice versa
learn words on land, recall underwater + vice versa
context dependent findings:
accurate recall was 40% lower in non matching conditions
external cues at time of learning were different from cues available - led to retrieval failure
state dependent (carter + cassaday):
divided into 4 conditions using antihistamines
learn words on drug, recall on drug + vice versa
learn words on drug, recall sober + vice versa
state dependent findings:
accurate recall was significantly lower in non matching conditions
internal cues available at learning were different from ones available at recall - retrieval failure
EVALUATION: research support
in addition to previous studies, researchers have found evidence of state dependent forgetting with different substances
darley et al - impact of marijuana on recollection, under influence = were less able to recall where they put their money when they were not under influence
adds weight to argument - emotional + physiological state at time of encoding is important
EVALUATION: questioning context effects
baddeley argued contexts have to be very different for effect to be seen
hard to find environment as different as land and water - learning something in room + recalling in another is not likely to result in much forgetting
real life applications to retrieval failure due to contextual cues may not explain forgetting
EVALUATION: recall vs recognition
context may depend on type of memory being tested
godden + baddeley - replicated experiment, used recognition not recall, say whether they recognised word from list - no context dependent effect + performance was same in all 4 conditions
limited explanation, only applies when person has to recall not recognise