Adorno et al = believed that unquestioning obedience is a psychological disorder and tried to find its causes in individual's personality
believes high obedience is pathological
characteristics of authoritarian personality
have exaggerated respect for authority and submissiveness to it
express contempt for people of inferior social status
authoritarians tend to follow orders and view 'other' groups as responsible for society's ills
AP originates in childhood
it forms in childhood through harsh parenting:
extremely strict discipline, expectation of absolute loyalty, impossibly high standards and severe criticism
also characterised by conditional love = parents' love depends entirely on how their child behaves
eg = 'I will love you if'
hostility is displaced onto social inferiors
the childhood experiences create resentment and hostility in the child BUT they cannot express these feelings directly against their parents because they fear reprisals
so the feelings are displaced onto others who are weaker - this is scapegoating
a psychodynamic explanation
AP test procedure
study investigated unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups of more than 2000 middle class white Americans
several scales were developed (including the potential-for-fascism scale, F-scale)
examples from F-scale = rated on scale 1-6 (6=agree strongly):
'obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues for children to learn'
'there is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel great love, gratitude and respect for his parents'
AP test findings
authoritarians (who scored high on the F-scale and other measures) identified with 'strong' people and were contemptuous of the 'weak'
they were conscious of their own and others' status, showing excessive respect and deference to those of higher status
authoritarian people also had a cognitive style where there was no 'fuzziness' between categories of people = with fixed and distinctive stereotypes (prejudices) about other groups
strength = evidence that authoritarians are obedient
Elms and Milgram = interviewed 20 fully obedient pps from Milgram's original obedience studies
they scored significantly higher on the F-scale than a comparison group of 20 disobedient pps
suggests that obedient people may share many of the characteristics of people with an authoritarian personality
counterpoint to supporting evidence
sub scales of the F-scale showed that obedient pps had characteristics that were unusual for authoritarians
eg = they did not experience high levels of punishment in childhood
suggests a complex link and means that authoritarianism is not a useful predictor of obedience
limitation = authoritarianism can't explain a whole country's behaviour
millions of individuals in Germany displayed obedient and anti-semitic behaviour - but can't all have the same personality
it seems unlikely that the majority of Germany's population had an authoritarian personality - a more likely explanation is that germans identified with the Nazi state
=> social identity theory may be a better explanation
SIT = behaviour/attitudes are strongly influenced by those of the groups we identify with
limitation = F-scale is politically biased
Christie and Jahoda = suggest the F-scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right-wing ideology
but right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism (eg Chinese Maoism) both insist on complete obedience to political authority
=> Adorno's theory is not a comprehensive dispositional explanation as it doesn't explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism (ie is politically biased)
extra evaluation = flawed evidence
the F-scale has been used in many research studies that have led to an explanation of obedience based on the authoritarian personality
BUT = the F-scale is flawed
eg = people who tend to agree to the statements (response bias) are scored as authoritarian
=> explanations of obedience based on research with the F-scale may not be valid