R is achieved when baby and caregiver respond to and elicit responses from each other
Eg = a caregiver responds to a baby’s smile by saying something and then the baby responds by making some sounds of pleasure
alert phases are times for interaction (R)
Feldman and Eidelman = mothers successfully respond around 2/3 of the time
From around 3 months, this interaction becomes more intense and reciprocal
babies have an active role (R)
Traditional views of childhood have seen the baby in a passive role, receiving care from an adult
BUT it seems that babies are active pps, both caregiver and baby can initiate interactions and take turns to do so
Interactions involve synchrony (IS)
Feldman = the temporal coordination of micro-level social behaviour
Eg caregiver and baby mirror each others’ behaviour
beginnings of interactional synchrony (IS)
Meltzoff and Moore
Observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in babies as young as 2 weeks old
Adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three gestures - filmed the baby’s response
Babies‘ expression and gestures were more likely to mirror those of the adults than chance would predict
importance for attachment (IS)
Isabella et al:
Observe 30 mothers and babies together and assessed the degrees of synchrony
The researchers also assessed the quality of mother-baby attachment
They found that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment (eg the emotional intensity of the relationship)
Strength = research on this topic used filmed observations
Mother-baby interactions are usually filmed, often from multiple angles - very fine details of behaviour can be recorded and analysed later
also babies don’t know they are being observed, so their behaviour does not change in response to observation (generally the main problem for observational research)
Means the studies have good reliability and validity
limitation = in the research there is difficulty observing the babies
It is hard to observe babies‘ behaviour because they are not very co-ordinated
we just observe small gestures and small changes in expression
It is also hard to interpret the meaning of babies’ movements
Eg deciding if a hand movement is a response to the caregiver or a random twitch
Means we cannot be certain that any particular interactions observed between baby and caregiver are meaningful
Feldman = points out that synchrony (and reciprocity) simply describe behaviours that occur at the same time
These are robust phenomena in the sense that they can be reliably observe BUT this may not be useful as it does not tell us their purpose
Means that we cannot be certain from observations that reciprocity or synchrony are important in development
counterpoint to difficulty inferring developmental importance
evidence from other sources (eg Isabella et al) o suggest that good levels of reciprocity and synchrony are associated with good quality attachments
Means that, on balance, these early interactions are likely to have importance for development
extra evaluation = practical value vs ethics
Practical value = research in to early interactions has allowed psychologists to improve the quality of caregiver-infant attachment
eg = by parent child interaction therapy
BUT this kind of research is socially sensitive = it can be used to argue that mothers should focus just on interacting with their baby and not return to work
Means that the practical value may be outweighed by its negative social consequences