Ainsworth and Bell = developed the strange situation as a method to assess the quality of a baby’s attachment to a caregiver
It is a controlled observation procedure in a lab (a controlled environment) with a two-way mirror through which psychologists can observe a baby’s behaviour
Ainsworth and Bell, the strange situation (procedure)
5 categories used to judge attachment quality:
Proximity-seeking = well-attached babies stay close to caregiver
Exploration and secure-base behaviour = good attachment makes a baby confident to explore, using the caregiver as a point of safety
Stranger anxiety = displayed by well-attached babies
Separation anxiety = displayed by well-attached babies
Response to reunion with the caregiver after separation for a short period of time = well-attached babies are enthusiastic
Ainsworth and Bell, the strange situation (procedure) pt 2
The procedure has 7 ‘episodes’, each lasting 3 minutes:
Baby is encouraged to explore by caregiver
Stranger enters and talks to caregiver, approaches baby
Caregiver leaves
Caregiver returns, stranger leaves
Caregiver leaves baby alone
Stranger returns
Caregiver returns
Ainsworth and Bell, the strange situation (findings/conclusions)
Ainsworth and Bell found distinct patterns in the way babies behaved
They identified 3 main types:
Secure attachment
Insecure-avoidant attachment
Insecure-resistant attachment
secure attachment
Type B
60-75% of British toddlers
Baby happy to explore but seeks proximity to caregiver (secure base)
Shows moderate separation anxiety and stranger anxiety
Requires and accepts comfort from caregiver on reunion
insecure-avoidant attachment
Type A
20-25% of British toddlers
Baby explores freely but does not seek proximity (no secure base)
Shows little/ no separation and stranger anxiety
Avoids contact at the reunion stage
insecure-resistant attachment
Type C
3% of British toddlers
Baby explores less and seeks greater proximity
Shows considerable stranger and separation anxiety
Resists comfort when reunited with caregiver
strength = the strange situation has good predictive validity
Attachment type predicts later development
Eg = secure babies typically have greater success at school
In contrast, insecure-resistant attachment is associated with the worst outcomes
Eg = bullying and adult mental health problems
This is evidence for the validity of the concept because it can explain (predict) future outcomes
counterpoint to having good predictive validity
Although the strange situation measures something that predicts later development - it may be measuring genetic differences in anxiety
Means the strange situation may not actually measure attachment
strength = strange situation has good inter-rater reliability
Different observers watching the same babies generally agree on attachment type
Eg = Bick et al = found 94% agreement in one team
This may be because the strange situation takes place under controlled conditions and because the behavioural categories are easy to observe
Means that we can be confident that the attachment type of a baby identified in the strange situation does not depend on who is observing them
limitation = the strange situation may be a culture-bound test
The strange situation test might not have the same meaning in countries outside europe and the US where it was created
Cultural differences in children’s experiences mean they respond differently
Eg = Japanese babies show anxiety because they are not used to being left caregiver
This means it is difficult to know what the strange situation is measuring in some countries/cultures
extra evaluation = other attachment types
Main and Solomon = identified a 4th category of attachment:
disorganised (type D) = a mix of resistant and avoidant behaviours
BUT = type D babies are unusual and have generally experienced some form of severe neglect or abuse - associated with late psychological disorders
Means that Ainsworth‘s classification is adequate as a description of normal variations in attachment