bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation

Cards (12)

  • continued emotional care is essential
    • continuous emotional (maternal) care from a mother or mother-substitute is necessary for normal emotional and intellectual development
    • Bowlby believed that mother-love in infancy is 'as important for mental health as are vitamins and proteins for physical health'
    • separation may lead to maternal deprivation
  • separation is different from deprivation
    • separation = means the child not being physically in the presence of the primary attachment figure
    • deprivation = means losing emotional care as a result of the separation
    • deprivation can be avoided if alternative emotional care is offered, thus separation doesn't always cause deprivation
  • critical period = 2 1/2 years
    • if a child is separated from their mother (without substitute emotional care) for an extended time during the first 2 1/2 years, then psychological damage is inevitable
    • continuing risk up to the age of 5
  • intellectual development = lower IQ
    • if a child is deprived of maternal care for too long during the critical period this may lead to mental retardation
    • Goldfarb = found lower IQs in children from institutions compared to foster children
  • emotional development = affectionless psychopathy
    • lack of emotional care may also lead to affectionless psychopathy
    • AP = the inability to experience guilt or strong emotion towards others
    • this prevents the person developing normal relationships and is associated with criminality
  • Bowlby 44 thieves study = procedure
    • sample in study = 44 delinquent teenagers accused of stealing
    • all 'thieves' were interviewed for signs of AP: characterised by lack of affection, guilt and empathy
    • families were also interviewed to establish and prolonged separations from mothers
  • Bowlby 44 thieves study = findings/conclusions
    • 14/44 thieves = could be described as AP
    • 12 of the 14 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers in the first 2 years of their lives
    • in contrast = only 5 of the remaining 30 'thieves' had experienced separations
    • suggests that prolonged early separation/deprivation caused AP
  • limitation = sources of evidence for maternal deprivation are flawed
    • 44 thieves study is flawed because it was open to bias = Bowlby himself assessed both deprivation and psychopathy, knowing what he hoped to find
    • Goldfarb's study of wartime orphans = flawed because he used traumatised participants who lacked good aftercare (this introduced confounding variables)
    • => means that Bowlby originally had no solid evidence on which to base his theory of maternal deprivation
  • Counterpoint to flawed evidence
    • Some evidence from newer studies to support the theory of maternal deprivation
    • Eg = Levy et al = found that separating baby rats for one day had permanent effect on their social development
    • Means that there is now some evidence for the theory of maternal deprivation after all
  • limitation = Bowlby confused deprivation and privation
    • Rutter = made the distinction between deprivation (separation from an attachment figure) and privation (failure to form an attachment)
    • Privation has more serious effects
    • The children Bowlby studied (eg the 44 thieves) and others he based his ideas on (eg Goldfarb’s wartime orphans) may have been prived rather than deprived
    • Means that Bowlby probably exaggerated the effects of deprivation on development
  • limitation = critical period is more of a sensitive period
    • Koluchova = conducted a case study on Czech twin boys isolated from age 18 months (locked in a cupboard)
    • Later they were looked after by two loving adults and appeared to recover fully
    • Shows that severe deprivation can have positive outcomes provided the child has some social interaction and good aftercare
    • Means that the period identified by Bowlby may be a ‘sensitive’ one but it cannot be critical
  • extra evaluation = conflicting evidence
    • Replications of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study (eg Lewis) have generally failed to reproduce his findings on psychopathy
    • BUT = some more recent research (eg Gao et al) has found links between poor maternal care and adult psychopathy
    • Means the link between maternal deprivation and psychopathy are unclear