Abilities are innate or born. Heredity influences are more important
Heredity
The genetictransmission of bothgenetic and physicalcharacteristics that pass from onegeneration to another
Nurture
Environment and experiences are moreinfluential.Abilities come from learning
The interactionistApproach
Behaviour does notnecessarilyderive from nature or nurturesolely it consists of both so the nature-nurture debate is about how they bothinteract
Diathesis stress model
Suggests behaviour is caused when a biological or environmentalvulnerability is paired with a biological or environmentaltrigger this
Includes both nature and nurture
Epigenetics
Refers to a change in geneticactivity without changing the genesthemselves
Happens through life and is due to interaction with the environment
Trauma and smoking can leave 'marks' on our DNA and can have lifelong influences even after it is gone
It can also influence the DNA of our children
Epigeneticresearch support
Malemice were given an electric shock when they smelt a cherry blossomsmell
They were then conditioned to develop a fearresponse to the cherryblossomsmell
When these micebred their children also developed a fearresponse to the smell even though they never experiencedshocks
They experiencedepigeneticchanges
Measuringnature and nurture
The degree to which two people are similar on a particular trait can be represented by a correlation coefficient and is called concordance
The extent to which a trait is inherited is heritability
A score of 1 means genes are the only reason for individual differences
IQ is said to be 0.5 as half a person's intelligence is said to be genetic and the other is environmental
Support for both nature and nurture: Brain Plasticity
The idea the brain can change and reorganise its structure (nature) as a result of experiencesinlife (nurture)
Taxi driver research showed the taxi drivers as a result of navigatingLondon increasing their experiences in life managed to change their brainstructure
This shows how both nature and nurture interact
Support for both nature and nurture: TwinStudies in OCD
Concordance rates for monozygotic twins for OCD is 68% and for dizygotic twins is 31%
Monozygotic twins share 100% of the same DNA so the concordancerates is not100% when it should be
Suggests that the environment may play a factor in developing OCD
AO3: Support from epigenetics
Environmentaleffects can spangenerations
Mice research with the cherry blossom and electric shock show how the fear response spanned generations despite the offspring not experiencing the shock themselves
This shows how this left marks on the DNA which can impact how the gene is displayed for offspring
AO3 Nature-Nurture : Support from the Diathesis Stress Model
Used to explain disorders such as schizophrenia and suggest that people may be born with certain genes that predispose them to develop a disorder
Identical twin studies research has shown that both twins may not develop a disorder even if one already has
The expression of a gene depends on experience or psychological stressors that trigger the condition
May only be expressed if triggered through environmental triggers
AO3 Nature-Nurture: Real World Application
OCD is a highly heritable disorder
The heritability rate is 0.76
Such understanding can lead to genetic counselling
Those who have a higher chance of developing OCD can understand the likelihood of developing the disorder and preventing it also
Has practical value
AO3 Nature-nurture: Hard to pull apart
Research for this approach is misguided and nature and nurture are not two entities that can easily be pulled apart
People create their own 'nurture' by actively selecting
An aggressive child may be comfortable around people similar to them
These people will then influence their development
Looking at evidence on nature and nurture is useless