when the research being conducted may impose some form of physical or psychological harm on the ptps or general population
informed consent
ptps must give their permission to take part in research & this consent must be informed (info must be made available on which to base a decision to participate or not)
deception
purposely misleading experiment ptps to maintain the integrity of the experiment, but not to the point where the deception could be considered harmful
protection from harm
the British Psychology Society (BPS)’s ethical guidelines state that
‘investigators have a primary responsibility to protect ptps from physical & mental harm during the investigation’
the research should NOT:
put ptps under unreasonable stress
traumatise them
humiliate them
confidentiality
keeping info private
privacy
a person’s desire to control the access of others to themselves
right to withdraw
the ptp can leave the experiment at any time & must be given the correct details so they can withdraw. if they do so, their data must be deleted
debriefing
the process of informing the pts after experiment about:
the purpose of the experiment
any deception that may have been used
presumptive consent
asking a group of people from the same target population as the sample whether they would agree to take part in such a study. if yes, then presume the sample would also consent
e.g zimbardo (asked his students if they would participate, then got diff ptps)
prior general consent
informing the ptp that they may be deceived in some way. the ptp then had a choice to consent or not to these terms. the ptp doesn’t know WHEN the experiment will take place
retrospective consent
ptps asked to give consent after study has taken place
cost - benefit analysis
a comparison of the benefits of the research & its costs to see whether the benefits outweigh the costs
BPS code of ethics
a set of guidelines which have been outlined by the British Psychological Society (BPS) for anyone carrying out psychological research in the UK: