Studied facial features of 2000 dead and alive prisoners
Findings- criminals had certain features (atavistic features)proposed thief’s had flatnoses and sexual glintin eyes
possibly implied we should use deathpenalty to remove these genes from the gene pool
chinese university used a criminal facial recognition software and found a great amount of criminals were correctly identified by their face
What were Sheldon’s physiological studies
studied body shape of 200 criminals and non criminals
Asked people to rank how close the people were to being a mesomorph- criminals were more commonly ranked as mesomorphs by the people
somatotypes- Mesomorphs, endomorphs and ectomorphs
Born criminals
What were the somatotypes (Sheldon)?
Endomorphs are round with wide hips and lack muscle or tone. They tend to be relaxed and sociable
Mesomorphs are muscular with brad shoulders and a narrow waist. They tend to be assertive and adventurous, but lack sensitivity and inhibition. (most likely to be criminal)
Ectomorphs are thin and fragile, with a thin face and a high forehead. They tend t be introverted and retrained. (Least likely to be criminal)
Strengths of Lombroso’s theory
First to take a scientific approach to understanding crime with evidence
Examined historical and medieval criminals
Created an agreement criminals do not choose their behaviour, so crime prevention was focused on instead of punishment
‘Prisons are crime universities’ as former prisoners usually reoffend
Butcher and Taylor found attractiveness has no effect on sentence
Weaknesses of Lombroso’s theory
Goring (1913) found no link between facial features and crime
Lombroso didn't have a control group, he might’ve just find characerteristics which are in the general population too
Racist to describe criminals as savages
DeLisi states Lombroso’s atavistic features are of African decent
Not everyone with atavistic features are criminals
Strengths of Sheldon’s study
has support from Putwain and Sammons study (2002) which found a link between physique and criminality
Most serious criminals in the study had the most mesomorphic bodies
Glueck and Glueck(1956)found 60% mesomorphs in delinquent sample but 31% in non delinquent sample
Sheldon had a large sample and a control group
Weaknesses of Sheldon’s study
sheldon doesn’t explain how other bodies can be criminal
peoples bodies change
doesn’t explain the type of crimes mesomorphs commit
convicted offenders with mesomorphs bodies are working class males who msot likely had a manual on, making them muscular
Sheldon’s theory causer bias and labelling of mesopmorprhs in court
mesomorphs could be dared to do more risky actions due to their looks
what is Steve jones take oncriminal ality?
testosterone makes men male and some men take extra for body building
taking extra is dangerous as it can cause severe damage, decreased life expectancy, higher violent death rates, crime, crashes, suppression of immune system
men murder 10 times more
Detroit has a murder rate of 1000 per mill likely due to drugs, gags and poverty
nature nd nurture are both factors of crime, but nurture can be changed
how to brain abnormalities link to crime?
phineas gage got a bar through his prefrontal cortex
he survived but was aggressive and irritable to the point he lost his job
prefrontal cortex regulates empathy, response flexibility, insight, intuition, fear modulation and personality/ emotion control
prefrontal cortex damage can lead to crime as a lack of control over these feelings can result in aggression
Evidence for brain injuries linking to crime?
Raine used radioactive tracers to track brain activity of murderers and gave ppts a 32 minute long task
PET scans to monitor criminal brain activity
Compared results with control group
Found the murders had prefrontal cortex damage
Dr James fallon did a similar experiment and found that he himself had the brain structure of a psychopath
what is an example of brain disease linking to criminality?
There was an epidemic of encephalitis lethargica in children in the 1920s aka sleepy sickness
It’s an inflammation of the usually brain caused by a virus
said to have led to impulsiveness, aggression and abnormal sexual behaviour for those after they had the disease
Strengths of using brain abnormalities/disease for explaining crimes
Brain injury led to change in behaviour (Phineas Gage)
Link between abnormal EEG (method of recording electric activity in brain) tradings and impulsive behaviour
Brain injury more likely to have happened to prisoners than non prisoners
Encephalitis letharhi a led to arson and abnormal/ sexual behaviour
weaknesses of using brain abnormalities/disease for explaining crimes
rare for brain injury to cause crime as previous personality its important
psychos can have normal EEG readings and non criminals can have normal ones
brain injuries can be an effect of crime such as fighting, rate hurt than a cause
Phineas gage was reported to improve personality in his later life (some evidence conflicts)
what are biochemical explanations of crime?
testosterone: ellis and coontz found correlation with testosterone peaks and highest crime levels with age, e.g rape and murder found to happen when testosterone was at its peak in men
pre menstrual tension, post natal depression and breastfeeding are used as a defence in crime
low sugar levels associated with aggression. loophole lowers blood sugar. Saunders found around 1000 alcohol arrests are linked
cocaine linked to aggression, cannabis, heroin mdma lower aggression. low serotonin levels can factor to aggression (Scarborough and Raine 1993)
What is the idea of genetic theories of crime?
physiological theories mean that some characteristics of crime must be inherited
people criminal behaviour runs in the family which can also show there may be a genetic link to crime
implies certain genes can lead to crime
Osborn and west found the sons of criminal fathers were much more likely to get a criminal record then sons of non criminals
what are the twin studies?
monozygotic twins share 100% (same egg split) dna and dizygotic share 50% (different eggs)
if one monozygotic twin commits a crime then genetics says the other will too
Christiansen‘s study wa on 3586 twins in Denmark. found a 52% concordance rate between monozygotic twins ( if one was convicted there 52% chance the other will be too). 22% in DZ twins
Ishikawa and Raine support this study as they found 44% concordance for MZ but 21.6% for DZ
concludes crime is partially genetic and nurture plays a role
what are the adoption studies?
adopted children‘s biological parents and adopted parents compared to separate genetic factors behind crime.
important to know when the children were adoptepted. Those adopted late could be partially nurtured by bio parents
mednick and hutchings compared 14k adopted sons in Denmark and found 20% concordance with biological parents in criminal records, compared with 14.7% in adopted parents. Also found adoptees with criminal records were more likely to have biological parents with a criminal record
Suggests there is a genetic factor but also environmental
what is Jacob’s XYY study
men get an extra Y chromosome, making them more manly. (super male chromosome)
very tall, well built, low intelligence
men with XYY are more violent and aggressive
Price and Whatmore found XYY males were immature and unstable, had. a strong tendency to commit random crimes.
in prisons, 15/1000 men have XYY. in public this is 1/1000
John Wayne Gacy tortured and killed 33 men and he had this
what are the Strenghts of the genetic theories?
comparison of MZ twins is useful and logical experiment for investigatinggenetics of crime. making the experiment natural
studies useful in separating genetics and environmental causes
ishikawa and Raine support study
Adler (2007) found aggressive and violent behaviour partially caused by genetics
what are the weaknesses of genetic theories?
MZtwins treat more alike than DZ twins, this can impact their behaviour similarities. MZ twins feel closer so they’re more influenced by eachother
adopted children put in environments similar to their birth parents (class, ethnicity, locality) which can explain similarity instead of genetics
Gottfredons and Hirschi argue genetic evidence behind criminality in the adoptionstudies is small
Jacob’s syndrome is relatively rare do cannot explain crime much