Diagnosis is reliable when different clinicians reach the same diagnosis for the same individual.
Test-retest reliability
When the same clinician reaches the same diagnosis for the same individual on two occasions
Reliability means consistency
Validity concerns whether clinicians are assessing what they are intending to assess, whether it is accurate
Factors that contribute to the low validity in diagnosis of SZ:
complexity and overlap of symptoms
subjective nature of diagnosis
lack of clear biological tests
Ward et al. (1962) identified three types of factors which affect the reliability of diagnosis:
Client/patient factors
Clinician factors
Classification factors
Client/patient factors
Clients may not be able to talk about their mental state clearly - may feel ashamed or leave out information
The person (a relative) speaking on the client's behalf may have a vested interest in the diagnosis being made and minimise or maximise the severity
Atypical presentations mean that not all clients present with the textbook symptoms and they may not exactly fit the DSM criteria
Clinician factors
How well the clinical interview is conducted depends on the rapport with the client and how the semi-structured nature of the interview unfolds
How well the clinician is trained and where they were trained
What approach in psychology they follow
How much they rely on observation or tests
Classification factors
Differences between DSM and ICD (the WHO system) descriptors of the illness and which is used by the clinician
The use of DSM criteria for billing purposes in private medical bills may lead to a bias in use
Sane in Insane Places
A psychological experiment conducted by Rosenhan in 1973
he explored the validity of psychiatric diagnoses, particularly in distinguishing between sane and insane individuals
Cheniaux et al. (2009) had two psychiatrists assess the same 100clients.
One psychiatrist diagnosed 26/100 patients according to DSM model and 44/100 according to ICD model
The other psychiatrist diagnosed 13/100 during the DSM model and 24/100 using the ICD model
Mason et al. (1997)
followed 99 patients with schizophrenia over 13 years to see if the validity of the main classification systems worked
found that if they used the symptoms that were present over six months, there was good validity
Jansson and Parnas (2007)
reviewed 92 studies that applied different definitions of schizophrenia to the same patient samples
found that both ICD-10 and DSM-5 had low accuracy with diagnosis
Cheniaux et al. (2009) has proven that schizophrenia is much more likely to be diagnosed using the ICD model, thereby calling into question the validity of the diagnosis systems
What classification model does the UK use for diagnosing schizophrenia?