reliability + validity

Cards (15)

  • Inter-rater reliability

    Diagnosis is reliable when different clinicians reach the same diagnosis for the same individual.
  • Test-retest reliability

    When the same clinician reaches the same diagnosis for the same individual on two occasions
  • Reliability means consistency
  • Validity concerns whether clinicians are assessing what they are intending to assess, whether it is accurate
  • Factors that contribute to the low validity in diagnosis of SZ:
    • complexity and overlap of symptoms
    • subjective nature of diagnosis
    • lack of clear biological tests
  • Ward et al. (1962) identified three types of factors which affect the reliability of diagnosis:
    1. Client/patient factors
    2. Clinician factors
    3. Classification factors
  • Client/patient factors

    • Clients may not be able to talk about their mental state clearly - may feel ashamed or leave out information
    • The person (a relative) speaking on the client's behalf may have a vested interest in the diagnosis being made and minimise or maximise the severity
    • Atypical presentations mean that not all clients present with the textbook symptoms and they may not exactly fit the DSM criteria
  • Clinician factors

    • How well the clinical interview is conducted depends on the rapport with the client and how the semi-structured nature of the interview unfolds
    • How well the clinician is trained and where they were trained
    • What approach in psychology they follow
    • How much they rely on observation or tests
  • Classification factors

    • Differences between DSM and ICD (the WHO system) descriptors of the illness and which is used by the clinician
    • The use of DSM criteria for billing purposes in private medical bills may lead to a bias in use
  • Sane in Insane Places
    • A psychological experiment conducted by Rosenhan in 1973
    • he explored the validity of psychiatric diagnoses, particularly in distinguishing between sane and insane individuals
  • Cheniaux et al. (2009) had two psychiatrists assess the same 100 clients.
    • One psychiatrist diagnosed 26/100 patients according to DSM model and 44/100 according to ICD model
    • The other psychiatrist diagnosed 13/100 during the DSM model and 24/100 using the ICD model
  • Mason et al. (1997)
    • followed 99 patients with schizophrenia over 13 years to see if the validity of the main classification systems worked
    • found that if they used the symptoms that were present over six months, there was good validity
  • Jansson and Parnas (2007)
    • reviewed 92 studies that applied different definitions of schizophrenia to the same patient samples
    • found that both ICD-10 and DSM-5 had low accuracy with diagnosis
  • Cheniaux et al. (2009) has proven that schizophrenia is much more likely to be diagnosed using the ICD model, thereby calling into question the validity of the diagnosis systems
  • What classification model does the UK use for diagnosing schizophrenia?
    ICD Model (2 or more negative symptoms present)