Self-disclosure means revealing personal information about yourself.
Romantic partners reveal more as they get more intimate.
Thoughts and feelings about one’s deepest thoughts and feelings can strengthen romantic bonds.
What is social penetration?
It is a major theory in Altman and Taylor (1973) in how romantic relationships develop.
It is gradually revealing your inner self, giving your deepest parts away.
It involves reciprocating exchange of information between partners.
When one partner reveals some personal information, it indicates they trust the other person and the other partner must also reveal sensitive information.
As they disclose more and more, romantic partners penetrate deeply into each other’s lives and gain understanding of each other.
Superficial layer of an onion?
Researchers use the metaphor of an onion to describe these elements.
At the start of a relationship, we disclose more superficial information, which is surface level and it is low risk information that we can share with anyone like co-workers and even acquaintances.
Breadth of disclosure is small as some topics are off limits.
They can threaten the relationship with too much information and get it going.
Deep layer of an onion?
However, as the relationship develops, self-disclosure becomes deeper.
This removes more and more layers with more topics.
This shows increased depth and breadth.
Eventually we may reveal intimate, high details like painful memories/ experiences or even secrets.
Reis and Shaver addition to social penetration theory?
Reis and Shaver point out that for a relationship to develop, there needs to also be a reciprocal element in disclosure.
When you disclose something to your partner that reveals your true self, it should be rewarding such as through empathy and their own intimate thoughts.
There is a balance between self-disclosure of both partners in a successful relationship and deepens the relationship.
Supporting study - Sprecher and Henrick (2004) studied heterosexual couples.
They found strong positive correlations between several measures of satisfaction and self-disclosure for both members in a couple.
Men and women who used self-disclosure and those who believed their partners did were more satisfied with their romantic relationship.
Negative evaluation regarding correlation?
However, most research into self-disclosure is correlational.
This creates bi-directional ambiguity as it may be that people who are securely attached self-disclose more rather than make them more secure.
Cause and effect cannot be inferred as a result. The relationship between both is unclear.
Real life implications?
Research into self-disclosure can help communication in couples.
Romantic partners use it deliberately and skillfully to increase intimacy.
Hass and Stafford found 57% of gay men and women found open and honest self-disclosure key to maintenance of a relationship.
Those who tend to limit themselves to small talk can learn using self-disclosure as bringing several benefits in a relationship by deepening satisfaction and commitment.
Issues of cultural bias?
There may be issues of cultural bias as the prediction of self-disclosure being more satisfying and intimate for all cultures.
For example, Tand et al looked at research regarding sexual self-disclosure.
They found that more sexual thoughts and feelings were self-disclosed in Americans than in China.
High sexual self-disclosure resulted in more satisfaction in America and viceversa in China.
Sexual self-disclosure is therefore a limited explanation of romantic relationships.
It is also not generalisable to other cultures and it is also culturally biased.