Save
...
Attatchment
Bowlbys theories
Internal working model
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Freya Cobby
Visit profile
Cards (11)
John
Bowlby (1988)
Rejected the
learning
theory as an explanation for
attachment
Proposed that attachment was an
innate
system that gives you a
survival
advantage
Monotrophy
the beluef that
infants
are born with the need to form a
primary
attachment with one
caregiver
Law of
continuity
The more
consistent
and
reliable
the care the
stronger
the attachment
Law of
accumulated
separation
The effects of every
separation
from the
mother
adds up
Social releases
Babies are born with cute actions to attract the attention of the
caregiver
e.g
big
eyes
, small chin,
crying,
cooing
Critical period
The time in which
attachment
must form if it is to form at all
Critical period length
first
6
months the
attachment
system is
active
- viewed more as a
sensitive
period
Critical period -
2
years
Bowlby proposed the
Internal
working
model
Internal
working model
The relationships formed in
childhood
mirror the ones they later
develop
EVALUATION - Weakness -
Lacks
validity
Schaffer
and
Emmerson
(1964) - Not only one
attatchment
is formed at once
The first relationship formed is
different
, not stronger
EVALUATION - strength -
Heidi
Bailey
et al (2007)
Measured attachment between
99
mothers and babies and mothers
primary
attachment figure
Found that mothers with
poor
attachments were more likely to have poor attachments with their
child