What is a strength for the Explanation for Phobias using the Behaviourist Approach?
Real World Application
The two-process model is used in exposure therapies and its distinctive element is the idea that phobias are maintained by avoiding the phobicstimulus
This is important in why people with phobias benefit from being exposed to the phobicstimulus; once the avoidance behaviour is prevented, it stops to be reinforced by the experience of anxiety reduction and avoidance therefore declines
This shows the value of the two-process approach because it identifies a way of treating phobias
What is a strength for the Explanation for Phobias using the Behaviourist Approach?
Phobias and Traumatic Experiences
The Little Albert study shows how a frightening experience involving a stimulus can lead to a phobia
AdDeJongh et al (2006) found that 73% of people with a fear of dental treatment had experienced a traumatic experience, compared to a control group of people with lowdentalanxiety where only 21% had experienced a traumaticevent
This confirms that the association between the stimulus and an unconditioned response does lead to the development of a phobia
What is a limitation for the Explanation for Phobias using the Behaviourist Approach?
Not all Phobias Occur From Bad Experiences
However, not all phobias appear following a bad experience and in fact, some common phobias, like snake phobias, occur in populations where very few people have experience of snakes let alone traumatic experiences
Additionally, not all frightening experiences lead to phobias
This means that the association between phobias and frightening experiences is not as strong as we would expect if behavioural theories provided a complete explanation
What is a limitation for the Explanation for Phobias using the Behaviourist Approach?
Cognitive Aspects of Phobias
Behavioural explanations, including the two-process model, are geared towards explaining behaviour and in the case of phobias, the key behaviour is avoidance of the phobic stimulus
However, we know that phobias are not simply avoidance responses and that they have a significant cognitive component
This means that the two-process model does not completely explain the symptoms of phobias
What is a strength for Systemic Desensitisation as a way of Treating Phobias?
Evidence for Effectiveness
Gilroy et al (2003) followed up 42 people who had systematic desensitation for spider phobia in 3 45-minute sessions
At both 3 and 33 months, the systematic desensitisation group were less fearful than a control group treated by relaxation without exposure
This means that systematic desensitisation is likely to be helpful for people with phobias
What is a strength for Systemic Desensitisation as a way of Treating Phobias?
People with Learning Disabilities
Some people requiring treatment for phobias also have a learning disabilities, however the main alternatives to systematic desensitisation are not suitable
People with learning disabilities often struggle with cognitive therapies that require complex rational thought and they may also feel distressed by the traumatic experience of flooding
This means that systematic desensitisation is often the most appropriate treatment for people with learning disabilities who have phobias
What is a strength for Flooding as a way of Treating Phobias?
Cost Effective
Clinical effectiveness means how effective a therapy is at tackling symptoms, however when we provide therapies in health systems like the NHS we also need to think about how much they cost
Flooding can work in as little as 1 session as opposed to approximately 10 sessions for systematic desensitisation to achieve the same result
This means that more people can be treated at the same cost with flooding than with systematic desensitisation or other therapies
What is a limitation for Flooding as a way of Treating Phobias?
Traumatic
Schumacher et al (2015) found that participants and therapists rated flooding as significantly more stressful than systematic desensitisation
This raises the ethical issue for psychologists of knowingly causing stress to their clients although this is not a serious issue provided they obtain informed consent
This suggests that overall therapists may avoid using this treatment