Save
Psychology
Attatchment
Romanian orphan studies
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Freya Cobby
Visit profile
Cards (10)
Romanian institutions (
1990s
)
President
required women to have
5
children
Families couldn't afford it
so put children into institutions
After revolution British parents adopted many
Ruttler et al (2011)
Procedure
Followed a group of
165
Romanian orphans for many years
Physical, cognitive and emotional development had been assessed at
4
, 6, 11,
15
,
22-25
years
A group of
52
brittish adopted children were used as control
Ruttler et al (2011)
Findings
When they first arrived showed signs of delayed intelectual development
11 years - children showed different rates of recovery related to the age of adoption
Before 6 months - IQ 102
6 months - 2 years - IQ 86
After 2 years - 77
Zeanah
et al

Procedure
Conducted the
Bucharest
early
intervention
project (BEI) to asses
95
Romanian children who had spent most of their life in institutions
They were compared to
50
children
never
in institutions
Attachment
type
measured against strange situation
Social workers also
quesitioned
Zeanah et al
Findings
Secure
attachment:
74%
control
19%
Romanian children
Disinhibited
attachment:
<20 control
44%
Romanian children
Disinhibited attachment
An attachment type developed by those
institutionalized
, equally friendly toward
familiar
people and
strangers
Intellectual disability
Delay
experienced by many
institutionalized
children
Evaluation- Strength
Real world application
Improved psychologists understanding of effect and lead to improved experiences
Children mainly now have one key worker
Institutionalization now seen as undesirable
Evaluation - Strength
Lack of
confounding
variables
Children did not come into institutionalization from a
bad
background instead came from
loving
parents
COUNTERPOINT
Institutions may have introduced
confounding
variables as care was
poor
Evaluation - Weakness
Lack of data on
adult
development
No current completed
longitudinal
study