a behaviour/characteristic that is statistically unusual then it's classed as abnormal.
what is a deviation of social norms?
ways of behaving that are not socially accepted.
how can social norms differ?
for different generations and cultures.
what did rosenhan and seligman (1989) propose?
failure to function adequately- some signs that can be used to determine that someone isn't coping:
person can no longer conform to interpersonal rules.
person experiences severe distress.
person's behaviour becomes irrational/dangerous to themselves/others.
what did jahoda (1958) propose?
ideal mental health: absence of the criteria indicates abnormality and potential mental disorder.
what is the cirteria for ideal mental health?
self attitudes= positive self-esteem and a strong sense of identity.
personal growth/self actualisation= the extent to which an individual reaches their full potential.
intergration= ability to cope with stress.
autonomy.
accurate perception of reality.
mastery of the environment.
what are the strengths of deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality?
allows a distinction between desriable and undesirable behaviours.
social dimension- definition gives a social dimension to the idea of abnormality, which offers an alternative to the isolated 'sick-in-the-head' individual.
protects society- the definition helps defend society from the effects of an abnormal person's behaviour on others.
what are the weaknesses of deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality?
subjective- social norms change over time, e.g. homosexuality was once defined as abnormal.
social norms change w/age across situations and cultures.
social control- szasz (1960): sees labelling 'mental illness' as a form of social control.
strengths of failure to function adequately definition?
observable behaviour- allows judgement by others whether individuals are functioning properly.
personal perspective- recognises the personal experience of sufferers and thus allows mental disorders to be regarded from the perception of the individuals suffering them.
checklist- definition provides a pratical checklist individuals can use to assess their level of abnormality.
weaknesses of failure to function adequately definition?
distress to others- althought a person's behaviour may cause distress to others, it may not cause distress to the individual at all, e.g. wearing a duck on their head.
subjective- although GAF measures levels of functioning, it doesn't consider behaviour from an individual's perspective. what is normal for an accentric, it abnormal for an introvert, e.g.
normal dysfunction- sometimes it's normal and healthy to experience and display distress, e.g. grieving over the death of a loved one.
strengths of deviation from ideal mental health definition?
holistic- considers an individual as a whole person rather than focusing on individual areas of their behaviour.
target areas of dysfunction- allows targetting of which areas to work on when treating abnormality.
positivity- emphasises positive achievements rather failures and distress. stresses a positive approach to mental problems by focusing on what is desirable, not undesirable.
weaknesses of deviation from ideal mental health definition?
ideal self is unattainable- most people don't meet the criteria all the time.
changes over time- perceptions of reality change over time. e.g. seeing 'visions' used to be linked to religion, now would be percieved as a sign of SZ.
cultural variation- criteria used to judge mental health are culturally relative and should not be used to judge others of dif cultures.
strength of statistical infrequency as a definition?
obective- not using subjective criteria to deem people as abnormal.
no value judgements- no judgements made. e.g. homosexuality which used to be defined as a mental disorder, is not under this definiton as 'unacceptable' or 'wrong' but merely less frequent than heterosexuality.
can be appropriate- in some situations, statistical criterion can define abnormality, e.g. mental retardation.
weaknesses of statistical infrequency as a definition?
not all infrequent behaviours are abnormal- some rare behaviours and characteristics are desirable rather than undesirable, e.g. being highly intelligent is statistically rare but desirable.
not all abnormal behaviours are infrequent- some statistically frequent 'normal' behaviours are actually abnormal. about 10% of people will be chronically depressed at some point in their lives, suggests depression is so common as to not be seen as abnormal under this definition.
where to draw the line- not clear how far behaviour should deviate from the norm to be seen as abnormal. disorders like depression vary greatly between individuals in terms of their severity.