internal working model

• what does the IWM suggest

  the attachment to the CG can provide a child with a blue print or template of how a relationship should work.
• whats the continuity hypothesis sugesting

  that children should use that blue print or template to mirror for later relationships
• what did wilson and smith 1998 do

  they assessed attachment types and bullying of friendly relationships.
• what did wilson and smith use

  a standard questionaire.
• what was wilson and smiths sample size

  196 children from london
• what was the findings

  secure attachment = best quality friendship and unlikely to be apart of bullying

  insecure avoidant = poor quality friendship and the victim of bullying

  insecure resistant = poor quality friendship and likely to be bullys
• what did hazen and shaver want

  to show impirical support for bowlbys working model of romantic relationships
• What was the sample size for hazen and shaver?

  620 Replies to the love quiz in an American newspaper
• what was the first question on the love quiz

  1. respondents current or more important relationship?
• what was the second question on the love quiz

  2) general love experience e.g number of partners
• what was the third question on the love quiz

  3) looked at attachment types by choosing three statements that describe them best.
• what were the findings

  56%=secure

  25%=insecure avoidant

  19%=insecure resistant
• how many people did bailey et al assess In 2004

  99 mothers with 1 year oled babies
• what was bailey et al measuring

  the quality of babies attachment to their own mothers using an interview
• what recording technique did bailey et al use

  interview
• what were the findings of bailey et als study

  Mothers who reported poor attachments to their parents in interviews were more likely to be classed as poor when it comes to parenting.
• What were the two weaknesses under this study

  not generalisable to areas of both the world and to all children.

  This is because the samples only done in London and samples only a size of 196 children.