Save
...
Philosophy
Arguments based on observation (cosmo. & teleo.)
Teleological
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Sophie Kennedy
Visit profile
Cards (16)
Keywords
a posteriori
- knowledge
dependent
on experience
inductive
- draws a general conclusion
teleological
- arguing to prove that everything has a purpose
Design argument
anything that has been designed needs a
designer
only possible designer is God
the appearance of design in the world proves that God exists
deductive argument
Aquinas' 5 ways
motion
causation
a necessary being
argument from
morality
argument from
design
Aquinas' 5th way
-
argument from design
the world is
contingent
, cannot be
self-causing
first necessary cause and mover can explain the universe's existence
proves the existence of God a posteriori
teleological
argument
universe is an intelligent design, must have a designer (God is creator)
Design qua purpose
the
universe
was designed to fulfil a purpose
Design qua regularity
the universe behaves according to order
gravity
did not just happen, must be a
designing principle
(God)
Watch
Analogy
impossible to exist without a
watch maker
, it has to be thought about
impossible to suppose the
universe
came about without a creator, must be God
Cons of the watch analogy
does not prove
God's existence
because:
no
designer
would create
natural disasters
science
can explain creation, without God
proves a designer, not a God
Paley
design
qua purpose and design qua regularity
Hume
1st argument - design implies great
designer
,
God
2nd argument -
natural selection
and possible way that the world came by
chance
Mill
nature
goes
unpunished
,
not
a result of
human
agency
either
no
God
, or an
immoral
God
Darwin
-
Evolution theory
design
is the result of random process
natural selection
gave the appearance of design
Dawkins
supports
Darwin
random
mutations
in DNA alone gave rise to world variation
Kant
we
weren’t
around for the
creation
of
the
world
so how do we know it had a
cause
cons
does not prove God exists because:
no
designer
would create natural disasters
science can explain creation, without God
proves a designer, not a God
Tennant
the
universe
was designed explicitly for the purpose of supporting human life
weak anthropic principle
- if the world was slightly different, human life would not exist
’there must be a
designer
because the universe perfectly fits the development of life’