study of animals in their natural environment within evolutionary context
ethological approach in aggression
considers drives and instincts which cause aggression
adaptive aiding survival
pass on genes so instincts concentrated in gene pool
as adaptive for natural selection
eg. Fixed Action Patterns (FAP's) and innate releasing mechanisms
Fixed action patterns and innate releasing mechanisms
do not require learning and occur when stimulus present (triggered)
sign stimulus - trigger FAP's
neural mechanisms (innate releasing mechanisms) produce a Fixed action pattern
FAP has reservoir of Actionspecific energy builds up overtime
sign stimulus causes release of energy
ASE must be rebuilt for FAP to be triggered again
FAP and IRM in aggression
sign stimulus = intruder
FAP sequence of aggressive behaviour
usually follows ritualistic pattern
threat display - assess strength of opponent and decide if worth escalating (need to pass on genes/ not conductive for members of same species to kill each other)
eg. mountain gorillas - pound chest and hoot
FAP's for conflict within species
Lorenz - animals with dangerous weapons with species have FAP's to prevent death
eg. wolves - expose throat in submission (sign stimulus for FAP of no attack)
Fixed action pattern
preprogrammed, instinctive sequence of behaviors in an animal
Innate releasing mechanism
a biological structure or process that triggers a specific behavioral response (FAP) when an organism is exposed to a particular stimulus
AO3: strength stickleback fish
Tinbergen
male fish given territory
model fish no red = no aggression
model fish red = aggression regardless of shape
colour is the sign stimulus and triggers FAp to protect territory and reproductive opps.
support ecological approach
AO3: weakness deterministic
no choice to attack - preprogrammed machine
response to sign stimulus is unpreventable
despite developed prefrontal cortex - not reflective of Humans developed abilities - control aggressive impulses
AO3: weakness incomplete explanation
only explains instantaneous aggression in response to stimulus - reactive
doesn't consider moral reasoning/empathy
doesn't account for planned aggression (war)
perhaps, technology has outpaced evolution - made FAP's due to development of technology as no longer useful as no sign stimulus and response calculated
AO3: support in humans
Dani people of Papa New Guinea
ritualised warfare to avoid deadly encounters but settle disputes
warrior charge as a group calling
size up opponent
threaten but don't throw spears
no cause and effect - behaviours may be cultural rather than innate - lack of evidence to conclude that as a result of FAP