Copernican Revolution: space time and causality are not 'out there' to be discovered. It is the way our mind organises experience
Cannot know the world in itself, only know how it appears to us
Minds are key to understanding the world
only good will can be regarded as good without clarification or reservation
Where empirical evidence is concerned we can never hav absolute certainty (straight stick may appear bent in water)
Kant's moral reasoning is normative ethic-like. It is concerned with how we should act/ what principles we should follow
The good will is autonomous and good without reservation
We are all aware of having a sense of moral obligation
purepractical reason is reason that chooses actions because they are good in themselves
pure reason is aware of the compulsion of the moral 'ought' : a sense of moral obligation, irrespective of the consequences
Kant believed it was possible to give a systematic account of our moral duties. Can be applied universally and is not circumstantial
His theory is deontological, so is based on our duty. Duty is always a matter of conscious choice
unqualified obligation is what 'ought' to be done. Rules bind us to our duties
His theory has teleological aspects; it doesn't mean that we should do duty for duty's sakewhatever the consequences
consequences have to be worked through before you can tell whether principle conforms to the categoricalimperative
After you have reasoned what you 'ought' to do, you should seek your duty
You are not acting moral if you do what you enjoy; potential enjoyment is irrelevant to the morality of an action
Morality of an action does not rely on results or inclinations
To have a 'good will' is not a natural gift, it is a chosen act. Aim is not to be happy but be worthy of being happy
The Categorical Imperative is an absolute, unconditional moral command. An ought that does not need qualification. Their good is intrinsic and can lead us to universal maxims
Maxims are general guidelines or principles of actions
First formulation is universalisability:
Act according to that maxim whereby at the same time will that is should become a universal law
Second formulation is the practical imperative:
Act in a way that you always treat humanity...never simply as a mean but always at the same time as an end
Third formulation is the Kingdom of Ends:
Act as though a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends
Problem of radical evil is despite rationality of the categorical imperative, human existence contains lots of moral evil
Kant argued we have a tendency to radical evil. It comes about when we focus on the maxim of self-interest
Radical evil is when we subordinate moral law to our own self interest
The hypothetical imperative is a conditional imperative. It is instrumental; done to get something good out of it
The hypothetical imperative is motivated by self interest. It can never lead to commands everyone ought to obey
'If A, then B'
The summumbonum is the highest or supreme good. Perfect happiness and fulfilment
The summum bonum is a reward for being virtuous as this person possess the good will
We can't achieve the summum bonum in this life; concept of it is evidence for God's existence. God exists to gurantee it
We have to will the highest good. Sense of 'ought' implies we can do our moral duty
Summum Bonum is the joining of virtue and happiness. Happiness is an optional bonus not an aim
The three postulates of practical reason are Freedom, God and Immortality
Freedom of the will: freedom is a necessary assumption at the core of morality. Know a prior we are free as if we weren't, morality makes no sense
By deciding to act and taking it in line with your duty, you presuppose freedom (Freedom, postulate of reason)
God and immortality 1:
God cannot command moral laws, they come from reason and good will
Nevertheless, feel the compulsion of the moral ought
'ought implies can'
God and immortality 2:
assume universe is fair and will reward with happiness (SB)