perry et al

    Cards (14)

    • background
      • Investigated the effect of oxytocin on preferred interpersonal distances, focusing on individuals with different levels of empathy.
      • Amygdala function: Plays a key role in regulating personal space, influenced by oxytocin.
      • People uncomfortable with close proximity show higher amygdala activity.
      • Interaction Effect Hypothesis: Perry tested whether oxytocin and empathy interact to influence personal space preferences.
    • psychology being investigated
      • Oxytocin: A hormone linked to social bonding, trust, and empathy.
      • Empathy: Ability to understand and share emotions of others.
      • Social Salience Hypothesis: Suggests oxytocin enhances attention to social cues (e.g., body language), modifying behavior based on social context.
      • Interpersonal distance (personal space): Preferred physical space between individuals, depending on relationship closeness
    • aims
      • Investigate how oxytocin affects preferred personal space, depending on empathy levels.
      • Test whether oxytocin's effects on social behavior differ between high- and low-empathy individuals.
    • research method and design
      • Research Method: Lab Experiment (University of Haifa, Israel).
      • Self-Report Method: Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) questionnaire to measure empathy.
      • Sampling Method: Volunteer Sampling (undergraduate students).
    • sample
      • 54 male undergraduates (University of Haifa, Israel).
      • Age range: 19 - 32 years (Mean = 25 years).
      • 5 were left-handed, all had normal or corrected vision, no psychiatric/neurological disorders.
      • Received course credit or payment for participation.
    • independent variables
      1️⃣ Empathy Levels:
      2️⃣ Treatment Conditions
      • Oxytocin (24 IU nasal spray).
      • Placebo (saline solution).
      3️⃣ Protagonist Type (Experiment 1):
      4️⃣ Experimental vs. Control Conditions (Experiment 2):
      • Experimental: Chair distance in a room preference task.
      • Control: Distance between a table and plant (non-social condition).
    • dependent variables
      1️⃣ Experiment 1: Preferred Interpersonal Distance (CID Paradigm).
      2️⃣ Experiment 2: Mean preferred distance and angle between chairs in a room setup.
    • general procedure
      1️⃣ Visit 1 & Visit 2: Participants came twice, one week apart (received oxytocin in one session, placebo in the other).
      2️⃣ Empathy Test: Completed IRI questionnaire.
      3️⃣ Oxytocin or Placebo Administration: Self-administered nasal spray (24 IU) under supervision.
      4️⃣ Waiting Period: 45 minutes of reading magazines (minimized social interaction).
      5️⃣ Experimental Tasks: Participants completed Experiment 1 or 2, depending on order assigned.
    • experiment 1: comfortable interpersonal paradigm
      1️⃣ Participants saw a virtual 3D room on a computer screen.
      2️⃣ Figures (friend, stranger, authority, or ball) approached from 8 directions.
      3️⃣ Task: Press a button to stop the figure when they felt uncomfortable.
      4️⃣ Each figure appeared 3 times from each direction (24 trials per figure).
      5️⃣ Total: 96 trials per participant.
      6️⃣ Distance was recorded as a percentage of remaining space (0% = closest, 100% = farthest).
    • experiment 2: choosing room setups
      1️⃣ Participants viewed pairs of room setups on a computer.
      2️⃣ Chairs varied in distance (20 cm - 140 cm) & angle (0°, 45°, 90°).
      3️⃣ Control Condition: Distance between a table and plant (non-social).
      4️⃣ 168 total trials (84 pairs x 2 repetitions).
    • results 1
      • Preferred distances (mean % remaining space):
      • Friend: 12.4%
      • Authority: 34.1%
      • Stranger: 39.8%
      • Ball: 20.2%
      • Oxytocin + High Empathy: Preferred closer distances (23.2%).
      • Oxytocin + Low Empathy: Preferred greater distances (30.2%).
    • results 2
      • High Empathy + Oxytocin → Chose closer chair distances (78 cm).
      • Low Empathy + Oxytocin → Chose larger chair distances (80 cm).
      • Oxytocin had no effect in non-social (table-plant) condition.
    • conclusions
      ✔ Oxytocin enhances social cue processing, but effects depend on empathy levels.
      ✔ High-empathy individuals → Oxytocin reduces preferred distance.
      ✔ Low-empathy individuals → Oxytocin increases preferred distance.
      ✔ People need less personal space with friends than with strangers.
    • controls
      Double-Blind Design → Neither participants nor researchers knew who received oxytocin/placebo (reduces bias).
      Standardized Oxytocin Administration → 3 drops per nostril, supervised.
      Counterbalancing → Half did Experiment 1 first, the other half did Experiment 2 first (reduces order effects).
      45-minute waiting period after oxytocin administration → Allowed full effect before testing.
      Empathy groups were pre-determined using IRI questionnaire.