Resistance to Social Influence

Cards (10)

  • Resisting conformity
    pressure to conform can be reduced if there are other people present who aren't conforming
    in Asch's study - not conforming doesn't have to be the 'right' answer but simply fact someone else isn't following majority appears to enable a person to be free to follow their own conscience.
    showed if 'non-conforming' person starts conforming again, so does naive ppt
  • Resisting Obedience
    pressure to obey can be reduced if there's another person who's seen to disobey
    one of Milgram's variations, rate of obedience dropped to 10% when genuine ppt was joined by a disobedient confederate.
    ppt may not follow disobedient person's behaviour but point is other person's disobedience acts as a 'model' for ppt to copy that frees him to act from his own conscience
  • Internal LoC
    people believe what happens in their life is largely result of their own behaviour and they have control over their life
    - take personal responsibility for their actions
    - confident
    - no need for external approval
    likely to resist social influence
  • External LoC
    people believe what happens to them is controlled by external factors and they don't have complete control over their life.
    - don't take responsibility for their own actions
    - can lack confidence
    - seek approval from others
    not likely to resist social influence
  • Resistance to social influence
    1. if person takes resposibility for their actions + experiences then they're more likely to base their decisions on their own beliefs rather than depending on opinions of others and resist pressure from others
    2. people with high internal LoC tend to be more self-confident, more achievement-oriented, higher intelligence and less need for social approval.
    personality traits lead to greater resistance to social influence these are also characteristics of leaders, have much less need for social approval than followers
  • Strength - support for role of dissenter in resisting conformity
    Allen and Levine found conformity decreased when there's one dissenter in Asch type study.
    occurred even if dissenter work thick glasses and said had difficulty with vision.
    Strength - study supports idea resistance isn't motivated by following what someone else says but enables someone to be free of pressure from group
  • Strength - support for role of dissenter in resisting obedience
    Gamson et al found higher levels of resistance in their study than in Milgram's. probably as ppts in Gamson's study were in groups.
    in study, ppts had to produce evidence that would be used to help oil company run a swear campaign.
    Gamso's study, found 29/33 groups of ppts (88%) rebelled against this.
    Strength - supports idea peer support links to greater resistance
  • Strength - support for link between LoC and resistance to obedience
    Holland repeated Milgram's study, measured whether ppts were internals or externals.
    results showed 37% of internals didn't continue to highest shock level and only 23% of externals didn't continue
    internals showed greater resistance, increasing validity of LoC explanation and confidence that can explain resistance
  • Weakness - contradictory research
    Twenge et al analysed data from American obedience studies over 40yrs
    data showed people have become more resistant to obedience but more external
    resistance were linked to an internal LoC then would expect people to become more internal.
    Weakness - challenges link between internal LoC and resistance, but results may be changing society where things are increasingly outside personal control
  • Weakness - role of LoC may be exaggerated
    Rotter et al found LoC is only important in new situations - little influence in familiar situations where previous experiences are always more important.
    means people who have conformed or obeyed in specific situations in past are likely to do so again, even if they have high internal LoC.
    Weakness - suggests LoC can only explain a limited range of situations where people might resist social influence