Refers to how consistent a measuring device is, this includes psychological tests or observations which assess behaviour.
Test-retest reliability
A method of assessing the reliability of a questionnaire or psychological test by assessing the same person on 2 separate occasions.
Shows the extent to which the test produces the same measure.
Involves administering the test or questionnaire to the same person on 2 separate occasions.
If test is reliable then results obtained should the same or similar each time.
Why should time be left in between retests in test-retest reliability?
Must be sufficient time between test and retest to ensure participants cannot recall their answers but not so long that their attitudes, opinions and abilities change.
Inter-observer reliability
The extent to which there is an agreement between 2 or more observers involved in an observation of behaviour.
This is measured by correlating observations of 2 or more observers.
+80 = High inter-observer reliability.
Improving reliability in questionnaires
Test-retest method
Comparing 2 sets of data should produce a correlation that exceeds +80.
A questionnaire that produces low test-retest reliability may require some of the items to be deselected or rewritten.
Replacing open questions which closed fixed-choice alternatives which may be less ambiguous.
Why would questions need to be removed from a questionnaire?
If some questions are complex or ambiguous they may interpretative differently by the same person on 2 separate occasions.
How to improve reliability of interviews?
Use the same interviewer every time.
If this is not practical, all interviewers should be trained.
More easily avoided in structured interviews where the interviewers behaviour is controlled by fixed questions.
Unstructured interviews are more free flowing and less reliable.
Improving reliability of experiments?
Procedures that focus of reliability.
In order to compare performance of different participants the procedure must be the same every time (standardisedprocedures)