All members of of the target pop. have an equal chance of being selected
HOW- complete list of all members of target pop, assign all names with a number, sample generated through 'lottery method' (can use a computer-based randomiser or picking numbers out of a hat)
What is systematic sampling?
Where every nth member of the target pop is selected
HOW- produce a sampling frame containing a list of people in target pop. organised in a certain way (e.g. alphabetical order), nominate sampling system through self or randomised choice (e.g. every 6th person), work through frame till sample is complete
What is stratified sampling?
Where the composition of the sample reflect proportions of people in certain sub-groups within the target pop. or wider pop.
HOW- researcher identifies the different strata that make up the pop., work out proportions needed to be representative, ppts that make up each stratum are selected using random sampling
What is opportunity sampling?
Selecting anyone who is willing and available to participate
What is volunteer sampling?
Involves ppts selecting themselves to be part of the sample
HOW- researcher can place advert or notice to attract willing ppts
Random sample strengths
Free from researcher bias, researcher has no influence over who is selected preventing them from choosing ppts who they think will support their hypothesis
Random samplelimitations
Difficult and time-consuming, list of target pop may be difficult to obtain and may end up with a sample that is unrepresentative of pop.
Selected ppts may refuse to take part and therefore means researcher may have to rely on a different form of sampling
Systematic sample strengths and limitations
:) Avoids researcherbias, selection method means researcher has no influence over ppts chosen, sample is likely to have higher validity
:) Fairly representative of target pop.
:( ppts may refuse
Systematic sample strengths and limitations
:) Avoids researcher bias, selection method means researcher has no influence over ppts chosen, sample is likely to have higher validity
:) Fairly representative of target pop.
:( ppts may refuse
Stratified sampling strengths and limitations
:) Avoids researcher bias, ppts are beyond influence of researcher due to strata divisions
:) Representative sample, designed to accurately reflect the composition of population, generalisations may be possible
:( Identified strata cannot reflect all differences, complete representation is therefore not possible, may decrease overall validity of generalisations
Strengths and limitations of opportunity sample
:) Convenient in terms of time, effort and money, less effort to organise
:( Highly bias, unrepresentative of target pop. due to ppts being from a specific area so findings cannot be generalised (low ev)
:( Researcher bias, complete control over ppt selection and may avoid certain people they do not want in study
Strengths and limitations of volunteer sample
:) Minimal input, less-time consuming and therefore beneficial to study
:( Volunteer bias, asking for volunteers may attract a certain profile or personality type which may affect overall findings and conclusions found, decreasing generalisability