of working age but without work. available for work and seeking work
inactive
people not seeking employment
people seeking employment but who are unavailable to start work
unemployment rate
(no of unemployed divided by no economically active) x 100
total unempolyed divided by (total unemployed + total employed)
2 ways of measuring unemployment
claimant count
labour force survey
claimant count
measures the number of people claiming unemployment related benefits
advantages of claimant count
easy to understand
cost effective way of collecting data
updated regularly, so accurate representation of levels
disadvantages of claimant count
difficult to compare figures over time due to regular changes
underestimates the real number of unemployed due to those who cannot claim benefits but are keen to find a job
fraudulently claimed benefits while working in the hidden market
labour force survey
A survey of employment in the UK, using the International Labour Organisation’s definition of unemployment (someone who is out of work but is willing and able to work, and able to start a job within the next 2 weeks).
advantages of labour force survey
more accurate as it is not based on machines but on peoples responses
internationally accepted definition and therefore can be used for comparisons
disadvantages of labour force survey
expensive and time consuming to collect information so could mean that it reflects what was the case rather than today
based on a sample which may not represent the entire population
why is the ILO figure higher than claimant count?
claimant count excludes:
people who are looking for work but do not qualify for benefits
people already claiming pensions
student leavers cannot qualify until next term starts
why do both methods underestimate the true figure?
do not include people working part time who want full time
do not include those on training schemes
some are sickness and disability benefits rather than being employed