Evidence from case studies of HM and CliveWearing support separate types of LTM
Episodic, in bothcases, was severelyimpaired but semantic relatively unaffected
They understood the meaning of words e.g. HMcouldn’trecallstroking a doghalf an hourearlier but understood the concept of ‘dog’
Proceduralmemories also intact - both knewhow to walk and speak and Cliveplay the piano
Strength = real-life applications
Beingable to identifydifferentaspects of LTM allows psychologists to targetcertainkinds of memory in ordertobetterpeople’slives
Being able to distinguishbetween the types of LTMenablesspecifictreatments to be developed
Belleville et al. (2006) found that episodic memories can be improvedin older people who have a mild cognitive impairment
The participantsperformedbetter on a test of episodicmemoryaftertraining than a controlgroup
Limitation = conflicting neuroimaging evidence
Conflicting research findings from brain scanning studies linking types of LTM to areas of the brain
Buckner and Petersen (1996) reviewed evidence regardinglocation of semantic and episodic memory
Concluded that semanticmemory is located in the leftside of the prefrontalcortex and episodic on the right
However, otherresearchlinksleftprefrontalcortex with encoding of episodicmemories and rightprefrontalcortex with episodicretrieval
Limitation = debate about division into 3 types
Someresearchers have disagreed with division and foundevidence which suggestsepisodic and semanticmemories are storedtogether
Cohen and Squire (1980) suggestproceduralmemoriesrepresentonetype of LTM but that episodic and semantic are storedtogether in one LTM store they calldeclarativememory
Declarativememory = memories that can be consciouslyrecalled