Individual differences like personality and gender
Personality - locus of control
the extent people feel they are in control of their own situation and lives
External - largely beyond their control
Internal - believe they are responsible
Authoritarianism is a personality trait that is characterised by hostility to people of a different race social group age sexuality or other minority
Theodor Adorno created the F scale
Milgram and elms 1966 - compared f score with 20 obedient and 20 defiant (obedience had a higher f scale and defiant showed more social responsibility)
Dambrun and vantage 2010 - milgrams experiment using VR Which also found the same
Empathy
high levels of empathy lead to lower obedience
Burger 2009 score high on empathy were more likely to protest it did not lower obedience
Gender is where woman might be less obedient because they are more empathetic or more obedient as they are more likely (sterotypically) to agree to male authority
Female milgram study was practically identical except woman felt more identical 27.5% stopped at 300 volts simply in blass 1999 found gender obedience was consiuatnt out of 9/10 studies
Khilam and mann 1974 replicated milgrams study in Australia and found woman were far less obedient 16% and men were 4-%
Situational variable
1.) Momentum of compliance where being it starts as small trivial requests
Situational variable
2.) Proximity - the closer the authority figure the higher. when the leaner couldn't be seen or heard at all obedience rose to 100% (milgram refers as buffer)
Situational variable
3.) Status of the authority figure - the highest obedience when authority figure seen as legitimate
Situational variable
4.) Personal responsibility - O strongest when felt hat someone else was taking responsibility
Culture can also have an effect on obedience through values ideas customs and norms
Individualistic culture - act more independently, resisting conformity and compliance (individualism)
Collectivist cultures - the group as a whole , collective , interdependence , cooperation and compliance
Difficult to replicate now but Ancona and paryson 1968 did the study in Italy gave a higher obedience rate 80% (max shock rate 330 and only used students)
Slater 2006 in the uk replicated milgrams with VR and had an obedience rate of 73.9%
Meuss and rajjmakhers 1986 in the Netherlands psychologically abuse interviews 92% obedience
Schurz 1985 in Austria but with bursts of ultrasound being fully warned of complications instead 80% obedience rate
Blass 2012 reviewed studies in us (60.94) and else where (65.94)