a partner thinks about their dissatisfaction with the relationship, but this is not disclosed to the other partner
describe the dyadic phase
both partners are aware of the the problem
there is confrontation and discussion
2 outcomes - determination to break up or desire to resolve the issues
describe the social phase
partners disclose their problems to others
friends and family become aware of the breakdown of the relationship
they may be helpful and suggest trying to work things out, or unhelpful by criticising and taking sides
describe the grave dressing phase
ex-partners begin the organisation of their post breakup life
each partner comes to terms with the breakdown and rationalises it by constructing a narrative of events
describe the resurrection phase
opportunity to move beyond the distress associated with the ending of a relationship
engage in the process of personal growth
strength of ducks phase model
research support
surveyed people who just left a relationship, reported emotional distress and personal growth
supports the resurrection phase giving the model a degree of validity
limitation of ducks phase model
research support has low population validity
study only surveys undergraduate students who have less experience
not representative of how wider population would experience a relationship breakdown
weak supporting evidence
limitation of ducks phase model
culturally biased
based on western cultures where relationships are voluntary and temporary; relationships in collectivist cultures are based on family decision and are permanent
model does not explain relationship breakdown in all cultures
limitation of ducks phase model
model lacks explanatory power
describes the sequence of events that lead to relationship breakdown without explaining why dissatisfaction occurs