SLT = considers both cognitive and environmental factors; aggressive behaviour learnt through rewards & consequences
Bandura (1965) - Bobo doll experiment, children observed an adult acting aggressively towards the doll or passively playing with it.
Self-efficacy = the extent to which we believe our actions will achieve a desired outcome
Bandura et al (1961)
Aim = influence of behaviour on children
Method = young children observed an aggressive or non-aggressive role models & then were allowed to play with a Bobo doll & a selection of aggressive/non-aggressive toys
Results = most children imitated behaviour they observed by the role model
Conclusion = children imitate modeled behaviour
Strength of SLT as an explanation for Aggression
Practical Value = reduce aggression by rewarding non-aggressive role models
Research Support = Poulin & Boivin (2000); behaviour mutually reinforced by modelling; reward = 'gang' approval
Weakness of SLT for Aggression
Weak explanation = Boivin and Poulin (2000); does not explain reactive aggression; RA = unpredictble, more negative