What is a limitation of variables affecting conformity?
Methodological issues
Artificial - not a valid measure of real-life conformity where conforming takes place in a social context and often with people we know rather than strangers.
Gender bias - Male sample so may not be representative of female behaviour.
What is another limitation of variables affecting conformity?
Child of its time
Asch’s finding is unique because they took place in a particular period of US history where conformity was more important.
In 1956, US was in McCarthyism (strong anti-communist period) where people were scared to go against the majority, and so more likely to conform.
Perrin and Spencer repeated study some years later (1980) and found only one conforming response out of 396 trials, where a majority unanimously gave the same wrong answer.
But in a subsequent study where they used youths on probation as participants and probation officers as the confederates, they found similar levels of conformity to those back in the 1950s.
This shows conformity is more likely when the cost of the not conforming are high.
What is another limitation of variables affecting conformity?
Problems with determining the effect of group size
Bond points out no other studies other than Asch used a majority group size greater than 9.
Asch concluded that a majority size of 3 was sufficient for maximum influence so subsequent studies have used three as majority
Bond points out no other studies other than Asch used a majority size greater than 9
This suggests we know little about the effects of group size on conformity.
What is another limitation of variables affecting conformity?
Unconvincing confederates
Asch’s study is that the confederates may not have acted convincingly.
If the confederates did not act convincingly when giving the incorrect answer, it could affect validity of the study.
Mori and Arai overcame this problem by getting participants to wear glasses with special polarising filters.
Three participants wore identical glasses that gave same stimuli, and one participant wore different ones, so they saw the stimuli differently.
They found similar results to Asch.
This suggests that the confederates in Asch’s study acted convincingly and so reinforces the validity of his findings.